Deriving Capacitor Voltage for a Discharging Capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the voltage waveform across a discharging capacitor that has been charged to a voltage ##v_0##. The correct expression for the current during discharge is established as ##i = \frac{v_0}{R} e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}##, leading to the voltage across the capacitor being ##V_c = v_0 e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}##. The initial mistake involved a dimensional error in the substitution of variables, which was corrected through careful analysis of the KVL equation. The importance of verifying dimensions during derivation is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with capacitor discharge equations
  • Knowledge of exponential decay functions
  • Basic circuit analysis skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitor discharge equations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of KVL in RC circuits
  • Explore the concept of time constants in RC circuits
  • Investigate dimensional analysis techniques in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or designing RC circuits will benefit from this discussion.

Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I'm trying to derive the voltage waveform across the capacitor for a discharging capacitor that has been fully charged by a DC power supply ##v_0##, i.e. ##v_c(t=0)=v_0## and then at ##t=0## the switch is flipped and the capacitor starts to discharge.
RC.png

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



From KVL we obtain
$$v_c=\frac{q}{c}=iR$$
Taking the time derivative of this and since capacitor is discharging ##-\frac{dq}{dt}=i##... $$-\frac{i}{RC}=\frac{di}{dt}\\ -\int_0^t \frac{dt}{RC}=\int_{i_0}^{i}\frac{di}{i}\\ -\frac{t}{RC}=\ln (\frac{i}{i_0})\\ i=i_0e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}$$
Now to solve for ##i_0## at t=0 ##\frac{q}{c}=i_0Re^{-\frac{t}{RC}}## becomes $$\frac{v_0}{c}=i_0R\\ i_0=\frac{v_0}{RC}\Longrightarrow i=\frac{v_0}{RC}e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}$$
Finally from KVL $$v_c=iR=\frac{v_0}{C}e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}$$

which is not the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potatochip911 said:
vc=iR=v0Ce−tRC
Potatochip911 said:
which is not the correct answer
Of course it isn't. You can see it is dimensionally incorrect.(Vo/C doesn't give voltage).
Potatochip911 said:
v0c=i0R
Where does this come from?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
cnh1995 said:
Of course it isn't. You can see it is dimensionally incorrect.(Vo/C doesn't give voltage).

Where does this come from?

I got that from the KVL equation (q/c=ir) and at t=0 so ##\frac{q(0)}{c}=i(0)R##
 
Q/C=Vo, not Vo/C .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
ehild said:
Q/C=Vo, not Vo/C .
Whoops, after making the proper substitution then we get ##i_0=\frac{v_0}{R}\Longrightarrow i=\frac{v_0}{R}e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}\Longrightarrow V_c=iR=v_0e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}## which is the correct expression :)
 
It is useful to check the dimensions during a derivation. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
870
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K