Deriving conclusion from a small data set

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter musicgold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data deriving Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving conclusions from a small dataset of GDP growth rates for five countries. Participants explore the implications of statistical significance, the role of standard deviation, and the uncertainties associated with the measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the countries have similar growth rates and if significant differences exist among them, given the small sample size.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of standard deviation in a small sample, with some suggesting that the standard deviation of the mean differs from the standard deviation of the dataset.
  • One participant introduces the concept of uncertainty in measurements and suggests that individual growth rates may have associated uncertainties that affect the overall analysis.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the statistical significance of measurements and the effects of temporary economic factors on GDP growth.
  • A method for hypothesis testing is proposed, involving the calculation of confidence intervals to assess whether differences between growth rates are statistically significant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of statistical significance in the context of the small dataset. There is no consensus on how to approach the analysis or the implications of the uncertainties involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the small sample size, potential inaccuracies in GDP measurements, and the need for a clearer understanding of statistical concepts such as standard deviation and hypothesis testing.

musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Hi

Please see table below GDP growth rates of a group 5 countries. I am trying to derive some conclusions from this small sample.

1. can I conclude that countries in the group have very similar growth rates and there is no significant difference between their growth rates?

2. As shown, the highest growth rate is just one std. dev. higher than the sample average. However, I am not sure if the std. dev. of such a small sample mean anything?

3. What would I need to do to be able to say that there is no statistically significant difference between these growth rates?

Thanks.

--------------------------------
Country GDP growth rates
A ---- 3.3%
B ---- 3.0%
C ---- 2.9%
D ---- 2.8%
E ---- 2.4%


Average 2.9%
Std. dev 0.3%
Range 0.9%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I imagine each of the individual figures have their individual uncertainties based on how they were calculated and the data used to do so.

The std.dev. of the mean is not the same as the std.dev. of the dataset.

If this were physics, then I'd take the uncertainty on each quoted rate as 0.1pp (percentage points)
Therefore the uncertainty on the mean will be 0.04 ... so they are all significantly off the mean growth.
But so what?

Does country E have the same growth rate as country A?
Their difference is 0.7pp ... that's outside 2x0.3 right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks Simon.
Simon Bridge said:
The std.dev. of the mean is not the same as the std.dev. of the dataset.
I am not sure what you mean by 'std dev of the mean'? Do you mean 'std dev. of the sample' or 'std error' ?

Simon Bridge said:
If this were physics, then I'd take the uncertainty on each quoted rate as 0.1pp (percentage points)
Therefore the uncertainty on the mean will be 0.04 ... so they are all significantly off the mean growth.
This is not clear to me. I mean I know what a pp is, but I don't understand how the uncertainty of the mean will be 0.04pp.
 
musicgold said:
Thanks Simon.

I am not sure what you mean by 'std dev of the mean'? Do you mean 'std dev. of the sample' or 'std error' ?
The std.dev. of the mean is the std.error of the value you got for the mean.
When each of the values in a data set have an uncertainty, the the mean of those values will also be uncertain.
Recall "hypothesis testing" in statistics?

This is not clear to me. I mean I know what a pp is, but I don't understand how the uncertainty of the mean will be 0.04pp.
That is the uncertainty on one value divided my the square root of the number of terms.
But I don't think the mean of the values is going to tell you what you want to know.

Consider: if you only had two values, how would you see if they were significantly similar?
 
There are two distinct questions that you can be asking:

1.) I measured five data points, but it's impossible to measure the GDP of a nation with 100% accuracy. Are these measurements the statistically different given the noise in the measurements?

2.) I have good measurements, but a nation's GDP growth can be affected by temporary effects. Are these five economies growing at statistically significant different rates?

Which one are you looking for?
 
Office_Shredder said:
There are two distinct questions that you can be asking:

1.) I measured five data points, but it's impossible to measure the GDP of a nation with 100% accuracy. Are these measurements the statistically different given the noise in the measurements?

2.) I have good measurements, but a nation's GDP growth can be affected by temporary effects. Are these five economies growing at statistically significant different rates?

Which one are you looking for?

Thanks. I think I am looking for the first one. How should I figure that out?
 
eg. let's say you have two data points ##x\pm\sigma_x## and ##y\pm\sigma_y## and you want to know if they are statistically different from each other.

That would be like asking if the difference ##x-y## is within some confidence interval of zero.

You know how to do "hypothesis testing" right?

In your case, you need some way of estimating the statistical uncertainty in each individual measurement.
A common estimator is to take half the smallest quoted place-value in the measurement.
i.e. A: (3.3±0.05)%

You also have more than two data points.
It is possible that countries A and B have similar enough growth to be statistically the same but A and E are statistically different.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K