Deriving Coulomb's Law from Gauss' Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving Coulomb's Law from Gauss' Law for electrostatics, specifically addressing a common confusion regarding the integration process. The participant initially arrives at a factor of 2π instead of the expected 4π due to misunderstanding the application of Gauss' Law. The correct approach involves integrating over the surface area of a sphere, where the electric field remains constant, rather than over the volume. This clarification confirms that the participant's math was not at fault, but rather the example provided was incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with spherical polar coordinates
  • Basic knowledge of electric fields and point charges
  • Proficiency in performing integrals in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Coulomb's Law from Gauss' Law in detail
  • Learn about the application of surface integrals in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of electric field uniformity over surfaces
  • Review examples of integrating in spherical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching Gauss' Law, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of electrostatics.

Ralru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When I try working out the example below from PlanetPhysics, I wind up with 2PI rather than 4PI in my answer. Should I be considering my result valid for only a hemisphere and double it for a sphere--or am I just making a mistake in my math?

"As an example of the statement that Maxwell's equations completely define electromagnetic phenomena, it will be shown that Coulomb's law may be derived from Gauss' Law for electrostatics. Consider a point charge. We can obtain an expression for the Electric Field surrounding the charge. We surround the charge with a "virtual" sphere of radius R, then use Gauss' law in integral form."

"We rewrite this as a volume integral in spherical polar coordinates over the "virtual" sphere mentioned above, which has the point charge at its centre. Since the electric field is spherically symmetric (by assumption) the electric field is constant over this volume" (http://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/DerivationOfCoulombsLawFromGaussLaw.html).




Homework Equations


[URL]http://www.fortunesofwar.com/C1.bmp[/URL]
[URL]http://www.fortunesofwar.com/C2.bmp[/URL]
[URL]http://www.fortunesofwar.com/C3.bmp[/URL]



The Attempt at a Solution


I first integrate Er sin theta dtheta between the limits of 0 and PI which gives Er(-cos theta) =2Er
Then I integrate 2Er dphi between the limits of 0 and 2PI giving 4'PI'Er
And then I integrate 4'PI'Er dr between the limits of 0 and R, giving 1/2 4'PI'Er^2 evaluated between 0 and R, giving 2'PI'ER^2.

I must be missing something here (it's been a while), so I'd appreciate knowing where I am making my mistake.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not making a math mistake. The example is wrong. The electric field isn't constant over the volume, and the integral shouldn't be over the volume of the sphere. The integral should be over the surface area, where the electric field is of constant magnitude.
 
Thank you very much. It's nice to know that I have not gone completely insane yet. It's been quite a while since I played with this stuff--and after a long hiatus, one begins to doubt his/her own ability. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K