Deriving Descriptions of Conic Sections from Fundamental Definition

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on deriving descriptions of conic sections from their fundamental definition, particularly focusing on the equivalence of the ratio of distances from a point on the conic to the focus and the directrix. The scope includes geometric and algebraic descriptions, as well as specific interest in the derivation of the directrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while conic sections are commonly defined as figures formed by the intersection of a plane with a right circular cone, there is a lack of derivation from the fundamental definition.
  • Another participant suggests a Wikipedia link for further reading, but this is met with skepticism regarding its completeness in explaining the directrix derivation.
  • A different participant provides a link to MathWorld, claiming it contains derivations related to the directrix.
  • Ultimately, one participant reports finding an answer on a different website, indicating some success in their search for information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the availability of satisfactory derivations for the directrix, with some expressing dissatisfaction with existing resources and others providing alternative links.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed derivation for the directrix from the fundamental definition, as well as varying interpretations of the sufficiency of the provided resources.

CarlisleLes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Everyone knows by now that a conic section is the figure formed when a plane intersects a right circular cone. Most everyone also knows that there are many different ways to describe a conic, geometrically and algebraically. What one seldom sees is the derivation of those descriptions from the fundamental definition. Using Dandelin Spheres it is easy to accomplish this for an ellipse. What I have never seen is a proof, based on the fundamental definition, of the equivalence of the ratio of the distances of a point on the conic to the focus and to the directrix, or even a definition of the directrix itself. Can anyone supply or direct me to such information? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have read that a dozen times. It doesn't explain the directrix derivation - just says it's possible to do so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K