Deriving displacement tensor from Hencky (true) strain tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter FQVBSina_Jesse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuum mechanics
Click For Summary
Hencky strain, also known as true or logarithmic strain, is related to the displacement tensor through the equation E = ln(U). It is primarily applied to principal strains, but calculating the full displacement tensor using this definition can yield inaccurate results, particularly for shear terms. When E is less than 1, especially in strain rate scenarios, the displacement tensor components tend to approximate 1, which is not reflective of the actual principal components. There is a noted lack of literature addressing the necessary corrections for shear terms in the context of Hencky strain. The discussion highlights the need for further exploration into the relationship between displacement and strain tensors.
FQVBSina_Jesse
Messages
54
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Calculating full displacement tensor from strain tensor using Hencky (true) strain definition.
The Hencky strain, AKA true strain, logarithmic strain, can be related to displacement tensor as follows:

$$
E = ln(U)
$$

However, Hencky strain is typically done only for principal strains. This can be easily shown by actually trying to calculate the full displacement tensor using the above definition:

$$
U = e^E
$$

Typically we have E<1, and if I am looking at a strain rate, then it is E<<1, the above equation will return a displacement tensor with a value around 1 in all components when only the principal components should be close to 1. I haven't found any literature discussing the proper correction to calculate the shear terms, specifically the Hencky definition of strain and displacement. Does anyone know more about this topic?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What about expanding exp(U) in a Taylor series using the Caley-Hamilton theorem?
 
FQVBSina_Jesse said:
TL;DR Summary: Calculating full displacement tensor from strain tensor using Hencky (true) strain definition.

The Hencky strain, AKA true strain, logarithmic strain, can be related to displacement tensor as follows:

$$
E = ln(U)
$$

However, Hencky strain is typically done only for principal strains. This can be easily shown by actually trying to calculate the full displacement tensor using the above definition:

$$
U = e^E
$$

Typically we have E<1, and if I am looking at a strain rate, then it is E<<1, the above equation will return a displacement tensor with a value around 1 in all components when only the principal components should be close to 1. I haven't found any literature discussing the proper correction to calculate the shear terms, specifically the Hencky definition of strain and displacement. Does anyone know more about this topic?
The displacements determine the components of the strain tensor, not the other way around.
 
Thread is paused for Moderation.

@FQVBSina_Jesse -- check your PMs please...
 
Thread is reopened. Thank you for your patience.
 
Somewhat separate from the coffee advice of “buy whole beans, grind fresh at home daily”, I'm looking to understand the factors that contribute to purchased ground coffee losing freshness after opening (oxygen, humidity, temperature, time, other?). I'm assuming oxidation is the main factor, assuming normal room temperature and mid-range humidity. It appears (I'm having trouble finding good info on this) that a high quality modern pre-ground coffee is packaged in a way that maintains...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
49K
  • · Replies 78 ·
2
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K