Deriving Formula for Rotational & SHM - Any Help Appreciated

  • Thread starter Thread starter trojsi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a formula related to rotational motion and simple harmonic motion (SHM), specifically aiming to connect linear and rotational quantities through a provided equation involving spring constant, mass, and moment of inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate linear and rotational dynamics but expresses difficulty in making the connections. Some participants question the validity of certain assumptions and suggest visualizing the motion more effectively. Others point out potential errors in the original poster's approach and clarify the distinction between angular speed and angular frequency.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempts, providing feedback and suggestions for improvement. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, and some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider the motion of the mass and the dynamics involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's reliance on a diagram and the need to correct certain aspects of their approach, including the use of angular quantities in the context of SHM. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the motion involved and the potential confusion arising from multiple angular quantities.

trojsi
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am asked to derive a formula from the diagram attached. I should end up with this equation:

[tex]f=1/2\pi (k/(M+I/R^2))[/tex]


I tried really hard relating linear quantities with rotational (T=Fr, T=I*alpha etc.) ones but it was all in vain.

Any help would be really appreciated.

thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show us what you have tried so far?
 
also, i think everything except the 1/2pi should be under a square root.
 
You were right on the square root, I will correct it. Please find attached what I have tried so far. There are about 2 full A3, but I wrote down what I thought makes sense.

thanks any help
 

Attachments

  • PTDC0074low.jpg
    PTDC0074low.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 382
ok, i see a couple of problems with your approach. first, i am not sure where you get the formula [itex]\alpha=\omega^2 R[/itex]. This is not true for SHM.

This leads to the second problem. you are attacking the problem as if were a statics problem, or as a constant acceleration problem. we need to start imagining this thing in motion. the mass is moving up and down and the spring is stretching and compressing. I would draw an x-axis beside the block and use that to measure where the block is at a giving time. let x=0 be the equilibrium position, this will be the most convenient. thus the motion is restricted to [itex]\pm A[/itex] where A is the amplitude of the motion. this will help with visualization.

now, one major point of confusion is that we are going to have two [itex]\omega[/itex]'s which mean totally different things. first we have the angular speed of the wheel at any given time, call this [itex]\omega_w[/itex], and since the wheel will be changing speed all the time, this will be a function of time, so [itex]\omega_w=\omega_w(t)[/itex].

the other will be the angular frequency of the SHM of the mass, let's just call that one [itex]\omega[/itex]. this is the one that will be constant and is the answer to the problem, well [itex]\omega=2 \pi f[/itex] and f is the answer.

so just to reiterate, [itex]\omega_w[/itex] is the angular speed of the wheel, so [itex]\alpha_w=\frac{d \omega_w}{dt}=\frac{a}{R}[/itex] where R is the radius of the wheel, and a is the linear acceleration of the mass. these are the quantities you want to use when applying Newton's second law to the wheel.

hopefully this will get you started in the right direction. this is a tricky problem, and i had to set up a differential equation (but not solve it) in order for [itex]\omega[/itex] to make itself known.

good luck
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K