Deriving the Fourier Transform of the Signum Function and Proving its Properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Fourier Transform of the signum function, defined as $$sgn(t)=\left\{\begin{matrix}-1, \ t<0\\0, \ t=0 \\ 1, \ t>0 \end{matrix}\right.$$ The Fourier Transform is given by $$S(\nu)=\frac{1}{j\pi \nu}$$, leading to the conclusion that $$j2\pi \nu S(\nu)=2$$. The participants clarify that $$S(0)=0$$ by using the sifting property of the Dirac delta function and recognizing the odd symmetry of the signum function, which results in the integral evaluating to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform properties
  • Knowledge of the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with the signum function and its definition
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function in Fourier analysis
  • Learn about the sifting property of the Dirac delta function
  • Explore the implications of odd and even functions in Fourier Transforms
  • Investigate the derivation of Fourier Transforms for piecewise functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in signal processing and Fourier analysis, particularly those working with piecewise functions and distributions.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


The signum function is defined by$$sgn(t)=\left\{\begin{matrix}-1, \ t<0\\0, \ t=0 \\ 1, \ t>0 \end{matrix}\right.$$It has derivative$$\frac{d}{dt} sign(t) = 2 \delta(t)$$Use this result to show that ##j2\pi \nu S(\nu)=2,## and give an argument why ##S(0)=0.## Where ##S(\nu)## denotes the Fourier transform of the signum function

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the Fourier transform of the sign function is:$$S(\nu)=\frac{1}{j\pi \nu}.$$
If we substitute this into ##j2\pi \nu S(\nu),## we get ##2## as expected. But the question wants us to show this result without deriving an expression for the Fourier transform of ##sgn(t).## How can we do this?

Furthermore, if we substitute ##0## in ##S(\nu)## we get ##S(0)=1/j\pi (0) = \infty.## So what does the question mean by giving an argument that ##S(0)=0##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the F.T. of ## f(t) ## is ## F(\nu) ##, isn't F.T. ## f'(t)=j \nu F(\nu) ## ? (with possibly a factor of ## 2\pi ## depending on your definition of F.T. and your frequency variable.) And you can readily compute the F.T. of the delta function..I don't have a good answer for the S(0)=0 yet...editing...For S(0), it appears the function ## S(\nu) ## goes symmetrically from minus infinity to plus infinity near ## \nu=0 ##...
 
Last edited:
Don't trust a given formula for S(v) here. You can derive S(0) yourself, and the result should be zero.
 
mfb said:
Don't trust a given formula for S(v) here. You can derive S(0) yourself, and the result should be zero.

How would you derive ##S(0)##? Did you use the sifting property ##S(0)=\int^\infty_{-\infty} \delta (t) \frac{1}{j \pi \nu} d\nu## or some other method?
 
roam said:
How would you derive ##S(0)##? Did you use the sifting property ##S(0)=\int^\infty_{-\infty} \delta (t) \frac{1}{j \pi \nu} d\nu## or some other method?
Why not use ## S(\nu)=\int sgn(t)exp(-i 2\pi \nu t) dt ## and set ## \nu=0 ##. The function is odd so the integral is 0. See also my post #2.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and roam
So using the property ##\frac{d f(t)}{dt} \leftrightarrow j 2 \pi \nu F(\nu),## we will have:

$$2 \delta (t) = j 2 \pi \nu S(\nu).$$

But according to the question this should be equal to just ##2.## How do I make the Dirac delta disappear?
 
roam said:
So using the property ##\frac{d f(t)}{dt} \leftrightarrow j 2 \pi \nu F(\nu),## we will have:

$$2 \delta (t) = j 2 \pi \nu S(\nu).$$

But according to the question this should be equal to just ##2.## How do I make the Dirac delta disappear?
Simple: ## 2\pi j \nu S(\nu)=F.T.( 2 \delta(t)) ##. The F.T. of the delta function is 1.
 
  • Like
Likes roam
Thank you, that makes perfect sense now.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K