Deriving the Laplace transform of t^n*e^(at)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 12K views
Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
laplace transform

Could anyone should me how it is you arrive to [tex]\frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}[/tex] as being the laplace transform of [tex]t^n e^{at}[/tex] ? Or at least provide a link?
I've done integration by parts but the term [tex]e^{(s-a)t}[/tex] will not go away.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If n is an integer the [tex]e^{(a-s)t}[/tex] term will go away after n iterations of integration by parts and one final integration of the term itself.
 
Last edited:
So far I have [tex]\int t^n e^{(s-a)t} dt = \frac{t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{s-a} - \frac{n t^{n-1} e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{2}} + \frac{(n^2-n) t^{n-2} e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{3}} . . . . . . .[/tex]. I'm just not seeing how [tex]e^{(s-a)t}[/tex] goes away.
 
Last edited:
I think the easiest way is to do it in pieces.

prove L[ t^n ] = n!/s^(n+1).

This is easy if you know
[tex]n! = \Gamma ( n+1 ) = \int_0^{\infty} t^n exp(-t) dt[/tex]
otherwise an inductive proof on n is pretty straight forward.

Then i would show if L[f(t)] = F(s) then L[f(t)exp(at)] = F(s-a). Since this is just a relable-ing operation it should
be easy to show.
 
Last edited:
an inductive proof

EDIT: changed the limits of integration to be from 0 to infinity (instead of -infinity to infinity).

The Laplace transform of [itex]t^n e^{at}[/itex] is

[tex]\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{at} e^{-st}dt=\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}[/tex]

an inductive proof goes as follows:

i. For n=0, [tex]\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^0 e^{(a-s)t}= \frac{1}{s - a} \left[ e^{(a-s)t} \right]_{t=0}^{\infty} = \frac{0!}{(s - a)^{0+1}}[/tex]

ii. Assume that

[tex]\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}[/tex]

holds for some fixed integer n >0, then

[tex]\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^{n+1} e^{(a-s)t} dt= \left[ -\frac{t^{n+1}e^{(a-s)t}}{s-a}\right]_{t=0}^{\infty} + \frac{n+1}{s-a}\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^{n} e^{(a-s)t} dt[/tex]

which, by hypothesis,

[tex]= \frac{n+1}{s-a}\frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}} = \frac{(n+1)!}{(s - a)^{(n+1)+1}}[/tex]

and so

[tex]\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}[/tex]

holds for every non-negative integer n by induction.
 
Last edited:
Tony11235 said:
So far I have [tex]\int t^n e^{(s-a)t} dt = \frac{t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{s-a} - \frac{n t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{2}} + \frac{(n^2-n) t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{3}} . . . . . . .[/tex]. I'm just not seeing how [tex]e^{(s-a)t}[/tex] goes away.


Remember that you differentiate the t^n term each iteration of integration by parts, so the exponent of t should decrese by one for successive terms in the above sum, after n such terms the exponent of t will be 0 leaving only the exponential to integrate.
 
Nice advice, but I was instructed to derive the laplace transform from integration by parts, or else I would have used the property, If L{f(x)} = F(s), then L{(e^at)f(x)} = F(s-a).
 
benorin said:
Remember that you differentiate the t^n term each iteration of integration by parts, so the exponent of t should decrese by one for successive terms in the above sum, after n such terms the exponent of t will be 0 leaving only the exponential to integrate.

Sorry, that was a typo.