The energy-momentum tensor for a perfect fluid is [itex]T^{ab}=(\rho_0+p)u^au^b-pg^{ab}[/itex] (using the +--- Minkowski metric).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Using the conservation law [itex]\partial_bT^{ab}=0[/itex], I'm coming up with [itex](\rho+\gamma^2p) [\frac{\partial\mathbb{u}}{{\partial}t}+ (\mathbb{u}\cdot\mathbb{\nabla})\mathbb{u}]= -{\nabla}p[/itex] instead of [itex]\rho[\frac{\partial\mathbb{u}}{{\partial}t}+ (\mathbb{u}\cdot\mathbb{\nabla})\mathbb{u}]= -{\nabla}p[/itex] (disregarding the body force part of the equation). Why is there a term for the part in brackets multiplied by [itex]\rho[/itex], but not for [itex]\gamma^2p[/itex]?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Deriving the Navier-Stokes equation from energy-momentum tensor

Loading...

Similar Threads for Deriving Navier Stokes | Date |
---|---|

I Partial Vector Derivative | Oct 15, 2017 |

I What is the Result of this Partial Derivative | Jun 21, 2017 |

I Solving Navier Stokes & energy equations with different coordinates | Mar 30, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**