I Deriving the relativistic rocket equation with exhaust efficiency

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relativistic rocket equation and its derivation, particularly when factoring in the annihilation of propellant to usable exhaust. The user is attempting to derive the equation from Wikipedia but is struggling to connect it with the standard form of the relativistic rocket equation. They successfully reduce the equation to its simpler form when the annihilation factor is zero but cannot reconcile their derivation with the more complex version that includes the fraction of usable exhaust. Questions arise regarding the definitions of exhaust velocity and the variables used in the equation, indicating a need for clarification on these terms to resolve the derivation issues. The conversation highlights the complexities of relativistic physics and the challenges in understanding advanced concepts.
halcyon_zomboid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
My derivation produces a relativistic rocket equation with exhaust "efficiency" that disagrees with this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter_rocket#Modified_relativistic_rocket_equation
Hi,

I'm looking at this relativistic rocket equation on Wikipedia. Something doesn't make sense here, and I can't find a derivation for this equation in the linked source, so I'm trying to derive it myself with limited success.

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}M}{M}=-\frac{\mathrm{d}v(1-v_\mathrm{ex}\frac{v}{c^2})}{(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})(-v_\mathrm{ex}\frac{v^2}{c^2}+(1-a)v+av_\mathrm{ex})}
$$
This is purportedly the relativistic rocket equation when accounting for annihilation to usable exhaust. To quote Wikipedia, " ##a## is the fraction of the original (on board) propellant mass (non-relativistic) remaining after annihilation (i.e., ##a=0.22## for the charged pions)."

I can see that this reduces to the usual relativistic rocket equation when ##a=0##:
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}M}{M}=-\frac{\mathrm{d}v}{v_\mathrm{ex}(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})}
$$

However, I can't seem to derive the above equation. Here's my attempt (which succeeds for the normal relativistic rocket equation):

In the COM frame, the rocket's initial mass is ##M+\mathrm{d}M##. Its final mass is ##M## and its velocity in this frame is ##\mathrm{d}v'##. Let's say the exhaust has mass ##\mathrm{d}m## and velocity ##v_\mathrm{ex}##, so if all the exhaust were usable, energy conservation would give
$$(M+\mathrm{d}M)c^2-Mc^2=\frac{c^2\,\mathrm{d}m}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_\mathrm{ex}^2}{c^2}}}
$$
(to first order in ##\mathrm{d}v'##). However, in reality, not all of the exhaust is usable. Let's say only a fraction ##\alpha## of the energy loss ##c^2\,\mathrm{d}M## is captured by beamed core exhaust pions:
$$
\alpha c^2\,\mathrm{d}M=\frac{c^2\,\mathrm{d}m}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_\mathrm{ex}^2}{c^2}}}.
$$

Okay, now let's look at momentum. For simplicity's sake, we'll assume all the useless energy is radiated symmetrically, so there's no effect on momentum. The final momentum of the rocket is ##M\,\mathrm{d}v'## (to first order in ##\mathrm{d}v'##), and that of the exhaust is
$$
-\frac{v_\mathrm{ex}\,\mathrm{d}m}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_\mathrm{ex}^2}{c^2}}}
=-\alpha v_\mathrm{ex}\,\mathrm{d}M
$$

But doesn't this then mean that

$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}M}{M}=-\frac{\mathrm{d}v'}{\alpha v_\mathrm{ex}}=-\frac{\mathrm{d}v}{\alpha v_\mathrm{ex}(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})}
$$
when we go back to the lab frame? I get nothing resembling the equation at the start.

Is there something wrong with my derivation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are ##v_{ex}## and ##v## in your formula ? I don' t find the former in Wikipedia you referred.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K