Destructive Interference in Water but not Air

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phenomenon of destructive interference in water compared to air when considering the scattering of monochromatic sunlight. It highlights that while air molecules can theoretically satisfy the conditions for destructive interference due to their density, this does not occur in practice. In contrast, water allows for effective destructive interference due to the different physical properties of water molecules and their interaction with light. The key equations referenced include Coulomb's Law and the conditions for destructive interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law
  • Knowledge of destructive interference principles
  • Familiarity with Rayleigh scattering
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Rayleigh scattering in detail
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of destructive interference conditions
  • Investigate the physical properties of water molecules affecting light scattering
  • Learn about the behavior of electromagnetic waves in different media
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, optical engineers, and researchers studying light-matter interactions, particularly in the context of atmospheric and aquatic environments.

Ichigo449
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a given monochromatic component of sunlight. The electric field drives a given air molecule. Each oscillating charge of the air molecule radiates waves in all directions, some of which travel to the eye of a given observer. But, for a given molecule (call it No.1) there is another (No.2) that is one half-wavelength farther from the observer. If both molecules are driven with the same amplitude and phase constant, their waves should superpose to give zero at the position of the observer. For scattering near ##\frac{\pi}{2}/## radians, we can obviously satisfy these phase and amplitude conditions, provided the number of air molecules per unit volume is large enough so that there is nearly always a molecule "No.2" for every molecule "No.1". So that section of the sky corresponding to the scattering should be dark. This is obviously false for air but, surprisingly, is true for water. Why?
Hint: Consider a small region in space (region 1) and consider another region (region 2) of the same size, situated at the same distance from the sun and situated one half-wavelength (consider a single monochromatic component of sunlight) farther from the observer than region 1. Assume that these regions are small compared with the wavelength. Let there be n1 and n2 molecules in regions 1 and 2 respectively. Compute the total electric field due to these regions and average the amplitude over a single period. Now consider the effect of fluctuations in the number of molecules over a long enough period of time.

Homework Equations


Coloumb's Law, Conditions for Destructive Interference

The Attempt at a Solution


I can find the electric fields by Coloumb but am not sure how to include the effects of fluctuations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a molecule is too heavy to respond to an optical wave.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K