Destructive interference through a narrow slit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of slit width in the context of destructive interference through a narrow slit. The initial incorrect calculation yielded a width of 4567 nm, while the correct value is 130881 nm. The confusion arose from the use of degrees instead of radians in the angle measurement, leading to the discovery that a multiplication factor of 28.7 is necessary to adjust the calculation. The relationship between destructive interference and the equation d sin θ = λ/2 is also clarified, emphasizing the importance of using radians for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference principles
  • Familiarity with the equations for constructive and destructive interference
  • Knowledge of angle measurement in both degrees and radians
  • Basic skills in solving equations involving wavelength and slit width
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equations for wave interference, specifically d sin θ = λ and d sin θ = λ/2
  • Learn about the conversion between degrees and radians in mathematical calculations
  • Explore the implications of using different units in physics problems
  • Investigate the role of constants in wave mechanics and their derivations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics and interference patterns, as well as anyone involved in optical engineering or related fields.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
angle=wavelength/a
So I thought angle=wavelength/width of slit

But when I solve for the width I got the wrong answer of 4567 nm, when the answer is suppose to be 130881 nm. I figured out that I needed to multiply my incorrect answer by 28.7, but where does this constant come from? Its not part of the equation when there's constructive interference.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 157
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
360 / 2\pi = 57.29..
 
anuttarasammyak said:
It might be half of coefficient between degree and radian
360 / 2\pi = 57.29..
How does that convert to multiplying wavelength/angle by 28.7?
 
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
anuttarasammyak said:
This coincidence hinted me that you might have used angle value of degree not radian in the calculation. How did you do it?

Youre right, not used to seeing degrees so small. But when I convert it to radians I now have to divide the answer I get by 2 to get the right answer, why is that?

width = wavelength/angle = 540 nm /0.00209 radians, but this gives me an answer that needs to be divided by 2 to get the right answer.
 
For enhanced interference
d\sin\theta=\lambda
For destructive interference
d\sin\theta=\frac{\lambda}{2}
, a half of the former.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K