MHB Determinant of Block Matrices: How Do Non-Zero Blocks Affect the Determinant?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the determinant of block matrices, specifically how non-zero blocks influence the determinant calculation. It is explained that when a matrix is structured as a lower triangular block matrix with a zero block, the determinant can be simplified to the product of the determinants of the non-zero blocks. The blocks do not need to be of the same size, as long as one of the upper blocks is zero. This flexibility in block size enhances the utility of this determinant property. Overall, the conversation highlights a valuable mathematical tool for calculating determinants of complex matrices.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4098

I don't quite follow this, can anyone explain?
 

Attachments

  • Confusion.PNG
    Confusion.PNG
    8.5 KB · Views: 107
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rido12. I haven't actually used this fact but it appears what is going on it that we are blocking the matrix into this form:

$$\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)$$

More particularly we are choosing $A_{12}=0$ so we end up with a lower triangular block matrix that looks like this:

$$\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} &0 \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)$$

So, $\text{det}\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} &0 \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)=\text{det}(A_{11}A_{22}-0A_{21})=\text{det}(A_{11}A_{22})=\text{det}(A_{11})\text{det}(A_{22})$

I think that's the basic argument. Here is a link with some useful info on it as well. :)
 
Hi Jameson! :D

Thanks for the reply - so it appears that the blocks don't have to be of the same size? By that, I mean $A_{11}$ appears to be of size $2$ by $2$ while $A_{21}$ seems to be of $3$ by $2$. If so, this seems to be a pretty useful tool! (Cool)
 
Rido12 said:
Hi Jameson! :D

Thanks for the reply - so it appears that the blocks don't have to be of the same size? By that, I mean $A_{11}$ appears to be of size $2$ by $2$ while $A_{21}$ seems to be of $3$ by $2$. If so, this seems to be a pretty useful tool! (Cool)

Hey Rido! ;)

See here.

So the block matrices can be of any size, but either right top, or left bottom has to be zero.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K