MHB Determinant of Block Matrices: How Do Non-Zero Blocks Affect the Determinant?

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4098

I don't quite follow this, can anyone explain?
 

Attachments

  • Confusion.PNG
    Confusion.PNG
    8.5 KB · Views: 104
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rido12. I haven't actually used this fact but it appears what is going on it that we are blocking the matrix into this form:

$$\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)$$

More particularly we are choosing $A_{12}=0$ so we end up with a lower triangular block matrix that looks like this:

$$\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} &0 \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)$$

So, $\text{det}\left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11} &0 \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{array}\right)=\text{det}(A_{11}A_{22}-0A_{21})=\text{det}(A_{11}A_{22})=\text{det}(A_{11})\text{det}(A_{22})$

I think that's the basic argument. Here is a link with some useful info on it as well. :)
 
Hi Jameson! :D

Thanks for the reply - so it appears that the blocks don't have to be of the same size? By that, I mean $A_{11}$ appears to be of size $2$ by $2$ while $A_{21}$ seems to be of $3$ by $2$. If so, this seems to be a pretty useful tool! (Cool)
 
Rido12 said:
Hi Jameson! :D

Thanks for the reply - so it appears that the blocks don't have to be of the same size? By that, I mean $A_{11}$ appears to be of size $2$ by $2$ while $A_{21}$ seems to be of $3$ by $2$. If so, this seems to be a pretty useful tool! (Cool)

Hey Rido! ;)

See here.

So the block matrices can be of any size, but either right top, or left bottom has to be zero.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K