MHB Determinant Property: Seen it Before? True?

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Has anyone seen this before? Is this true?
$$
\begin{vmatrix}
a & b+c & 1\\
b & a+c & 1\\
c & a+b & 1
\end{vmatrix} =
\begin{vmatrix}
a & b & 1\\
b & a & 1\\
c & a & 1
\end{vmatrix} +
\begin{vmatrix}
a & c & 1\\
b & c & 1\\
c & b & 1
\end{vmatrix}
$$
In this example this works but I don't know if this just a coincidence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, determinants are linear w.r.t. addition in any single row or column. (Wink)
 
Determinants are multilinear, alternating functions of row or column vectors. If one adds the stipulation that:

$\det(I_n) = 1$

then these properties completely determine the determinant function.

Clearly one such function (the determinant function) with these properties exists. For a proof that the determinant function is the ONLY function with these properties, see:

http://www.millersville.edu/~bikenaga/linear-algebra/det-unique/det-unique.html
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K