MHB Determinant using gaussian elimination

brunette15
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I am attempting to find the determinant using gaussian elimination for the following matrix [4 3 2; 1 7 8; 3 9 3].
I have begun by attempting to form zeros below the diagonal. The answer should be -165, however i keep getting values up to -665. I have tried a variety of times and keep getting really big numbers :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brunette15 said:
I am attempting to find the determinant using gaussian elimination for the following matrix [4 3 2; 1 7 8; 3 9 3].
I have begun by attempting to form zeros below the diagonal. The answer should be -165, however i keep getting values up to -665. I have tried a variety of times and keep getting really big numbers :/

Your matrix is [4 3 2; 1 7 8; 3 9 3]...

a) divide the first row by 4 and subtract it fron the second row obtaining [4 3 2; 0 25/4 15/2; 3 9 3]...

b) multiply the first row by 3/4 and subtract it from the third row obtaining [4 3 2; 0 25/4 15/2; 0 27/4 3/2]...

c) multiply the second row by 27/4 and subtract it from the third row obtaining [4 3 2; 0 25/4 15/2; 0 0 -33/5]...

d) the determinant is d= 4 25/4 (- 33/5) = - 165...

kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Hello, brunette15!

Find the determinant using Gaussian elimination: .\begin{vmatrix} 4&3&2 \\ 1&7&8 \\ 3&9&3 \end{vmatrix}

I have begun by attempting to form zeros below the diagonal.
The answer should be -165; however, i keep getting values up to -665.
I have tried a variety of times and keep getting really big numbers.
If you show us your attempts, we can point out your errors.

\;\;\begin{array}{c}\text{Given:}\end{array} \;\begin{vmatrix} 4&3&2 \\ 1&7&8 \\ 3&9&3 \end{vmatrix}

\begin{array}{c}R_1-R_3 \\ \\ \\ \end{array}\;\begin{vmatrix}1&\text{-}6&\text{-}1 \\ 1&7&8 \\ 3&9&3 \end{vmatrix}

\;\;\;\;\;\begin{array}{c}\\ \\ \frac{1}{3}R_3 \end{array} \; \begin{vmatrix} 1&\text{-}6&\text{-}1 \\ 1&7&8 \\ 1&3&1 \end{vmatrix}\;\cdot\;(3)

\begin{array}{c}\\ R_2-R_1 \\ R_3-R_1 \end{array}\;\begin{vmatrix}1&\text{-}6&\text{-}1 \\ 0&13&9 \\ 0&9&2\end{vmatrix}\;\cdot\;(3)

\;\;\;\;\begin{array}{c}\\ \frac{1}{13}R_2 \\ \\ \end{array} \;\begin{vmatrix} 1&\text{-}6&\text{-}1 \\ 0&1&\frac{9}{13}\\0&9&2 \end{vmatrix}\;\cdot(3)\cdot(13)

\begin{array}{c}\\ \\ R_3-9R_2\end{array} \; \begin{vmatrix} 1&\text{-}6&\text{-}1 \\ 0&1&\frac{9}{13} \\ 0&0&\text{-}\frac{55}{13}\end{vmatrix}\;\cdot (3)\cdot(13)\;\;(1)(1)(\text{-}\tfrac{55}{13})\cdot (3)(13) \;=\; -165
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K