Determination of atomic bases in unit cell using Wien2k

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the specification of atomic positions within a unit cell in the Wien2k software. Participants are exploring whether the X, Y, Z components correspond to the unit cell vectors (a, b, c) or to a Cartesian coordinate system. The inquiry includes considerations of conventions used in defining these coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the X, Y, Z components in Wien2k correspond to the unit cell vectors (a, b, c) or to Cartesian coordinates.
  • Another participant suggests that the usual convention is to specify XYZ in units of the unit cell vectors a, b, c.
  • A proposed method to verify this involves using a primitive low-symmetry cell and checking the results after modifying the lattice parameters.
  • A later reply confirms that the XYZ coordinates are indeed in units of the unit cell vectors a, b, c.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no explicit consensus on the initial question, but one participant confirms the understanding that XYZ are in units of the unit cell vectors. The initial uncertainty remains regarding the interpretation of the coordinates.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the initial query about the conventions used in Wien2k, and the verification method proposed relies on assumptions about the behavior of the software.

hokhani
Messages
601
Reaction score
22
After specifying the primitive vectors of a structure namely (a,b,c) in Wien2k, one has to specify locations of atoms in unit cell.There are three components X,Y,Z which determine the atom location. I want to know whether "X,Y,Z components" are corresponding to vectors a,b,c or they are components of the cartesian system? In other words If we have a typical (X,Y,Z), dose it means that atom location is r=Xa/a+Yb/b+Zc/c or r=Xi/a+Yj/b+Zk/c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
________________
 
I don't know Wien2k, but the usual convention is to specify XYZ in units of the unit cell vectors abc.

An easy way to check is to use a small, primitive low-symmetry cell, calculate whatever you calculate, and then to double a lattice parameter and add a basis e.g. at (1/2,0,0) for a-->2a. The result should be the same.

If not, you are not using the correct convention.
 
M Quack said:
I don't know Wien2k, but the usual convention is to specify XYZ in units of the unit cell vectors abc.

An easy way to check is to use a small, primitive low-symmetry cell, calculate whatever you calculate, and then to double a lattice parameter and add a basis e.g. at (1/2,0,0) for a-->2a. The result should be the same.

If not, you are not using the correct convention.

Yes. you are right. I found that XYZ are in units of abc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K