Determination of moment of inertia

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the period of a pendulum as described in a provided document. Participants are examining the equations related to torque and forces acting on the pendulum, specifically questioning the validity of certain approximations and the presence of trigonometric functions in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are comparing their reasoning with the equations presented in the document, particularly focusing on the omission of the sine function in torque calculations. There is a discussion about the appropriateness of approximating cos(ϕ) to 1 and the implications of this on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants questioning the setup and assumptions in the equations. Some have offered clarifications regarding the components of forces and torques, while others are still grappling with the implications of these approximations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the original document's equations and are attempting to reconcile their interpretations with the provided material. The discussion highlights potential simplifications that may affect the accuracy of the results.

ajcoelho
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've been trying to find out what is the period os this kind of pendulum decribed here: http://www.eng.uah.edu/~wallace/mae364/doc/Labs/mominert.pdf

The thing is, I've came to the same result shown in equation (11) but my reasoning it's different. I would even say that there is an error on this website on equation 5: in this equaition where is the sin of theta?? It can be omitted, only if the angle between the force vector and position vetor is 90º, but it's not the case clearly!

Am I thinking well? In my reasoning I had also to the aproximattion of cos theta ≈ cos of phi ≈ 1 and in this site things are really simplified just because of that lack of sin of theta...

If you're interested i can also post my reasoning but I'd like to get some help on this equation 5 first...

Thanks a loot!


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
At best there is a cosΘ (which is very close to 1), but the suspension points are still 2a apart on the equilibrium line, so the F point a little more outward than drawn in the figure.
 
the thing is: what goes to torque equation is Tx right? Beacause Ty and Mg/2 cancell one another
 
The torque equation would be numbered (5) ? That is for the z component of the torque vector ##\tau = \vec r \times \vec F## (I suppose you will learn that vector version much later on, for now: it is for the torque about a vertical axis going through C). The expression is correct, the drawing is not. F should point more outwards.

I can't find much wrong with (6) for the magnitude of F.

For the torque around the x-axis (front view, fig.1, from C towards you) you indeed have
(mg/2 a/2) + (mg/2)(-a/2)=0.
 
But suppose you're viewing from end view. Then, the forces are above...

So, what really makes torque isn't Tx??

Then we make Ty=Mg/2, and so on...
 

Attachments

  • Sem título.jpg
    Sem título.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 573
From the pdf I gather the x-axis is (in the front view) pointing towards the viewer. Take C as the origin. If the y-axis is pointing to the right, then the z axis is pointing up. ##I\ddot \theta## is then the z component of the torque ##\tau##
 
I get it now... But i still have that cos (phi) that i have to approximate to 1 right?
 
Where is that ##\cos \phi##??
 
Ty = Mg/2 = T cosϕ

therefore: T = mg/2cosϕ

therefore: Tx = mg sin ϕ / 2 cosϕ
 
  • #10
Ah, my mistake. Your T is the tension in the wires, not a torque as I was stupily reading. You are absolutely right. And yes, assume ##\phi## is so small that the cosine is 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K