Determine rank of T and whether it is an isomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotvette
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism rank
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the linear transformation T defined as T((x_0, x_1, x_2)) = (0, x_0, x_1, x_2). It is established that T is linear and invertible; however, it fails to be an isomorphism in finite dimensions due to the discrepancy in dimensions, where dim(T(M)) = 4 and dim(M) = 3. The confusion arises when considering infinite sequences, where T can be viewed as an isomorphism. The conclusion is that while T is an isomorphic embedding, it is not an isomorphism in the strictest sense, as it only applies to a subspace of the codomain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations
  • Knowledge of isomorphisms in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with finite and infinite dimensional spaces
  • Concept of rank in linear mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in finite dimensions
  • Explore the concept of isomorphic embeddings and monomorphisms
  • Learn about infinite dimensional vector spaces and their characteristics
  • Investigate the implications of dimension in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians exploring linear transformations, and educators teaching concepts of isomorphisms and dimensionality in vector spaces.

hotvette
Homework Helper
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


T((x_0, x_1, x_2)) = (0, x_0, x_1, x_2)

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm getting hung up on definitions. My book says that T is an is isomorphism if T is linear and invertible. But it goes on to say that for T of finite dimension, T can only be an isomorphism if dim(T(M)) = dim(M). The T as stated is linear and invertible, but dim(T(M)) = 4 and dim(M) = 3 which indicates it isn't an isomprphism. Rank = dim(M) = 4.

If I were to define T as T((x_0, x_1, x_2, \cdots))=(0,x_0, x_1, x_2, \cdots) the dim test doesn't apply because T deals with an infinite sequence, and we can say T is an isomorphism.

It doesn't make sense that in the finite case, T isn't an isomorphism but it is in the infinite case. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##T(x)=(0,x)## is an isomorphic embedding, a monomorphism, i.e. isomorphic to the image of ##T##. It's just a bit sloppy to say ##T## is an isomorphism, since it is only on a subspace of the codomain.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K