Determine the highest and lowest elevation on a path

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miley4567
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the highest and lowest elevations of the function z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x² - (1/9)y² along the path defined by the parametric equations r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. Participants suggest rewriting the function f(x,y) in terms of the parameter t by substituting x(t) and y(t) into the function. The consensus is that using Lagrange Multipliers is unnecessary for this problem, and instead, applying first and second derivative tests is the recommended approach to find extreme values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations and their derivatives
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Familiarity with first and second derivative tests for extrema
  • Basic concepts of Lagrange Multipliers and when to apply them
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert parametric equations into functions of a single variable
  • Study the application of first and second derivative tests for finding extrema
  • Explore the limitations and appropriate use cases for Lagrange Multipliers
  • Practice solving optimization problems using derivatives in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on optimization problems, as well as anyone seeking to understand the application of derivatives in multivariable functions.

Miley4567
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the highest and lowest elevations given by the height
z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x^2 - (1/9)y^2
on the path r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. The xy position on the path at time t is given by r(t).

Homework Equations


Lagrange Multipliers
Partial derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to try using the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the extreme values of the function f(x,y), but I would need the xy position to be given as an equation and in x and y terms. I am confused as to how to do this because we are given a position vector instead, in terms of t.

Could anyone help me out and guide me with how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miley4567 said:

Homework Statement


Determine the highest and lowest elevations given by the height
z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x^2 - (1/9)y^2
on the path r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. The xy position on the path at time t is given by r(t).

Homework Equations


Lagrange Multipliers
Partial derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to try using the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the extreme values of the function f(x,y), but I would need the xy position to be given as an equation and in x and y terms. I am confused as to how to do this because we are given a position vector instead, in terms of t.

Could anyone help me out and guide me with how to do this?
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.
 
Before choosing the method, understand the problem.
The path is being given to you as a position vector that varies with t. What shape is the path?
As you travel along that path, how does z vary?

[edit] mark44 beat me to it.
 
Mark44 said:
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).

Here's what Mark44 said above:
Mark44 said:
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.

Try that.
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
If you are having trouble understanding mark44's suggestion, try the focussing questions in post #3.
It is very difficult to tell you more detail without effectively telling you the answer too.
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
LCKurtz said:
Here's what Mark44 said above:Try that.
Ya I get that, but to use Lagrange Multipliers, I need two sets of equations, and plugging in the 2cost and 3sint into the f(x,y) equation still only leaves me with one equation to use to find a max and min.
 
So don't use Lagrange multipliers... have you heard of the 1st and second derivative tests?
 
Miley4567 said:
Ya I get that, but to use Lagrange Multipliers, I need two sets of equations, and plugging in the 2cost and 3sint into the f(x,y) equation still only leaves me with one equation to use to find a max and min.

I don't see why you would want or need to use Lagrange multipliers in this problem. Lagrange multipliers are designed to deal with certain types of problems, and this is not one of them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K