Determine the potential energy function of the charged particle

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
SLTH02
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The electrostatic force repelling a charged particle from a long, straight, uniformly charged rod is given by
the equation F = 100 x ^ (-1) where x is the distance from the rod.
Relevant Equations
F = -(dU)/(dx)
I understand that you need to integrate f(x), and the negative of that is U(x).

But the last part of the problem says "Clearly state any assumptions you make."

And the answer is just the antiderivative of that f(x) without any constant from integrationHow does that make sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good observation. You might insert the actual question in the homework statement, but I gather the exercise asks for 'the' potential energy function.

Such a function is in fact determined to within a constant (we don't observe potentials, only forces ...) . Usually we take the potential to be zero at infinity, but in this case that can not be done: a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
 
BvU said:
a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
So what would happen if the linear charge is infinitely long?
 
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SLTH02
BvU said:
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
Got it. thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU