Determine the probeʼs final speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbjohnybaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final Speed
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the final speed of a deep-space probe given its mass, initial speed, and the force exerted by its engines over a specified distance. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, particularly work-energy principles and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the work-energy theorem and the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. Some suggest using F = ma to find acceleration, while others question the calculations of work done and the application of significant figures.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem, with participants providing different methods and questioning each other's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of F = ma and the importance of maintaining significant figures in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the calculations of work done and emphasize the need to consider the initial velocity and total distance traveled. There is also mention of the assumption that the decrease in mass due to fuel consumption is negligible.

jbjohnybaker
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
need help!

A deep-space probe of mass 4.55 x 10^4 kg is traveling at an initial speed of 1.22 x 10^4 m/s. The engines of the probe exert a force of magnitude 3.85 x 10^5 N over 2.45 x 10^6 m. Determine the probeʼs final speed. Assume that the decrease in mass of the probe (because of fuel being burned) is negligible.
-------------------
m = 4.55 x 10^4 kg
Vi = 1.22 x 10^4 m/s
Fa = 3.85 x 10^5 N
D= 2.45 x 10^6 m

----------------------
w = (F)(D) (cos 0)
wtotal = 1/2mv^2f - 1/2mv^2vi

------------------
w= (4.55x10^4)(2.45x10^6)
w = 1.11475x 10^11

Wtotal = 1/2mv^2f - 1/2mv^2vi
1.11475x 10^11 = 1/2(4.55x10^4)(vf^2) - 1/2 (4.55x10^4)(1.22x10^4)
1.11475x 10^11 = 1/2(4.55x10^4)(vf^2) - 3.38611 x10^12
1.11475x 10^11 + 3.38611 x10^12 = 1/2 4.55x10^4 (V^2)
v = sqrt ( 2(3.498x1012) / 4.55x104

v= 1.24 x10^4 m/s??
The real answer is 1.38 x10^4 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Rather than KE, why don't you try that old standby F = ma. Remember, you have an initial velocity specified before F is applied, and you know the total distance traveled during which F is applied.
 


jbjohnybaker said:
-------------------
m = 4.55 x 10^4 kg
Vi = 1.22 x 10^4 m/s
Fa = 3.85 x 10^5 N
D= 2.45 x 10^6 m

----------------------
w = (F)(D) (cos 0)
wtotal = 1/2mv^2f - 1/2mv^2vi

------------------
w= (4.55x10^4)(2.45x10^6)
w = 1.11475x 10^11

You've multiplied mass by distance rather than force by distance, so you've got an incorrect value for the work done by the engine over the given distance.
 


gneill said:
You've multiplied mass by distance rather than force by distance, so you've got an incorrect value for the work done by the engine over the given distance.

I tried
W = (3.85^5)(2.45x10^6)
= 9.43x10^12 J
And I did the rest but still don't the right answer
 


SteamKing said:
Rather than KE, why don't you try that old standby F = ma. Remember, you have an initial velocity specified before F is applied, and you know the total distance traveled during which F is applied.

But i don't know what the acceleration is :S
 


You know the mass and the force, right?
 


jbjohnybaker said:
I tried
W = (3.85^5)(2.45x10^6)
= 9.43x10^12 J
And I did the rest but still don't the right answer

You're off by a power of ten. Should be 9.43x1011 J.
 


SammyS said:
You know the mass and the force, right?

yes the mass and the force are known
 


W = (F)(D) cos 0
W = (3.85x10^5)(2.45x10^6) cos 0
W = 9.4 x 10^11 J

W = 1/2mv^2f - 1/2mv^2i
9.4x10^11 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2 - 1/2 (4.55x10^4)(1.22x10^4)^2
9.4x10^11 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2 - 3.38611 x10^12
9.4x10^11 + 3.38611 x10^12 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2
4.8011 x10^12 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2

vf = sqrt (2(4.8011x10^12))/ (4.55x10^4)
vf = 1.46x10^4 m/s <-- not the right answer

the correct answer is 1.38x10^4 m/s
 
  • #10


Well Johnny, you've hit the wall again. Sorry. Why don't you try F = ma? It's so easy. You've got F. You've got m. Don't you think you could get a? Once you've got a, it's constant over the entire distance travelled. m doesn't change. You know the initial velocity and the total distance travelled. Don't you think you could find t for me, Johnny? Then you could be happy, Johnny. Once you know a, t, and the initial velocity, everything will be all right. Don't you think so, Johnny?
 
  • #11


jbjohnybaker said:
W = (F)(D) cos 0
W = (3.85x10^5)(2.45x10^6) cos 0
W = 9.4 x 10^11 J

Do not round so much during calculations. The data are give with 3 significant digits, keep one more (four ones).

jbjohnybaker said:
W = 1/2mv^2f - 1/2mv^2i
9.4x10^11 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2 - 1/2 (4.55x10^4)(1.22x10^4)^2
9.4x10^11 = 1/2(4.55^14)vf^2 - 3.38611 x10^12

what is that 4.55^14?

You applied the Work Theorem, and it is a best method when the force and displacement are given and the final speed is the question. Calculate it again but do not drop significant digits.

ehild
 
  • #12


SteamKing said:
Well Johnny, you've hit the wall again. Sorry. Why don't you try F = ma?
You are not right. It is no need to get the time of acceleration. Johnny applied a much shorter and easier method to get the final speed.

ehild
 
  • #13


He's getting the wrong speed because he messed up his addition in post #9.
4.33*10^12 = 0.5*m*vf^2

And my method works perfectly well. After all, I was able to calculate vf.
 
  • #14


i solved it..thank you very much
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K