Finding the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy

  • #1
aqryus
6
1
Homework Statement:
A deep space probe of mass 4.55 x10^4kg is travelling at an initial speed of 1.22 x10^4
m/s. The engines of the probe exert a force of magnitude 3.85 x10^5
N over 2.45 x10^8 m. Determine the probes final speed
Relevant Equations:
W=Ek2-Ek1
W=fd
W=(1/2)mv2^2-(1/2)mv1^2
First I found work:

W=(3.85x10^5)(2.45x10^8)
W= 9.43x10^13

Then used that for difference of kinetic energy:

9.43x10^13 = (1/2) (4.55x10^4)v2^2 - (1/2)(4.55x10^4)(1.22x10^4)^2
9.43x10^13 = (22750)v2^2 - 3.386x10^12
9.43x10^13 + 3.386x10^12 = (22750)v2^2
9.77x10^13 = 22750v2^2
9.77x10^13/22750 = v^2
squareroot 4.3x10^6 = v
6.55x10^4 = v

But the answer is 1.38x10^4 m/s? I'm not sure where I went wrong. Any help is appreciated
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Frabjous
Gold Member
1,044
1,171
Are the exponents for the distance and force correct?
 
  • #3
aqryus
6
1
Is the exponent for the distance or force correct?
definitely an 8 on the worksheet
 
  • #4
Frabjous
Gold Member
1,044
1,171
If the work is a factor of 100 smaller, you get their answer. Check the units also. Also check the force.
 
  • #5
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
12,808
6,002
squareroot 4.3x10^6 = v
6.55x10^4 = v
I don't know about the calculations that brought you to the two last equations but the very last equation does not follow from the next to last equation. The square root of 4.3 is a bit more than 2 and the square root of 10^6 is 10^3. So the answer that follows should have been a bit more more than 2000. You need to redo the calculations.
 
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
39,545
8,812
I don't know about the calculations that brought you to the two last equations but the very last equation does not follow from the next to last equation. The square root of 4.3 is a bit more than 2 and the square root of 10^6 is 10^3. So the answer that follows should have been a bit more more than 2000. You need to redo the calculations.
The 106 is a typo. Should be 109.
 
  • #7
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,165
185
Something is not adding up here.

The 9.4x1013 J of work is roughly 30 times greater than the initial kinetic energy of 0.34x1013 J. So, we'd expect the final speed to be a factor of roughly sqrt(30) times the initial speed, as the OP got.

However, the quoted "correct answer" is only about 13% greater than the initial speed (1.38/1.22=1.13). Even if the probe started from rest, doing that much work would give a much greater final speed.

Either there's a typo in the given quantities, or whoever is providing the "correct answer" made an error.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
39,545
8,812
Something is not adding up here.

The 9.4x1013 J of work is roughly 30 times greater than the initial kinetic energy of 0.34x1013 J. So, we'd expect the final speed to be a factor of roughly sqrt(30) times the initial speed, as the OP got.

However, the quoted "correct answer" is only about 13% greater than the initial speed (1.38/1.22=1.13). Even if the probe started from rest, doing that much work would give a much greater final speed.

Either there's a typo in the given quantities, or whoever is providing the "correct answer" made an error.
As noted by @Frabjous in post #4, taking either the thrust or the distance over which it is applied down two orders of magnitude gives the book answer.
 

Suggested for: Finding the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy

Replies
4
Views
570
Replies
1
Views
268
Replies
14
Views
287
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
522
Replies
6
Views
575
  • Last Post
Replies
25
Views
434
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
706
Replies
3
Views
534
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
551
Top