Determine whether the subset is a vector subspace

In summary: The Attempt at a Solutionℙ = { ƒ ∈ F | f(x) = ax3, a ∈ ℝ }f(0) = a(0)3 = 0 Thus, ℙ is a non-empty set.There is a difference between a polynomial as a whole and its values at certain points, here ##x=0##. For ##f(x)=ax^3## to be identically zero, it has to be zero for all possible values of ##x##, not only for ##x=0##. Thus is doesn't matter what ##f(0)## is. ##f(
  • #1
BubblesAreUs
43
1

Homework Statement


Recall that F is the vector space of functions from ℝ to ℝ, with the usual operations of addition and scalar multiplication of functions. For each of the following subsets of F, write down two functions that belong to the subset, and determine whether or not the subset is a vector subspace of F.

a) The set of polynomials of degree equal to 3.

Homework Equations



Axions: Set ℙ ≠ ∅, ℙ is closed under addition and ℙ is closed under scalar multiplication.

The Attempt at a Solution



ℙ = { ƒ ∈ F | f(x) = ax3, a ∈ ℝ }

f(0) = a(0)3 = 0 Thus, ℙ is a non-empty set.

Let g, h ∈ ℙ then,

g(x) = bx3
h(x) = cx3

g + h = g(x) + h(x) = bx3 + cx3 = (b + c)x3

Thus g + h is closed under addition.

Let f ∈ ℙ Λ k ∈ ℝ then,

k⋅f = k⋅f(x) = k(ax3) = ak(x3) = (ak)x3

Thus k⋅f is closed under scalar multiplication.

Therefore ℙ is a vector space of F.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
BubblesAreUs said:

Homework Statement


Recall that F is the vector space of functions from ℝ to ℝ, with the usual operations of addition and scalar multiplication of functions. For each of the following subsets of F, write down two functions that belong to the subset, and determine whether or not the subset is a vector subspace of F.

a) The set of polynomials of degree equal to 3.

Homework Equations



Axions: Set ℙ ≠ ∅, ℙ is closed under addition and ℙ is closed under scalar multiplication.
You probably mean axioms, as axions are hypothetical particles in physics. But these aren't axioms either. It is the definition of a vector space. You don't need to require ##\mathbb{P} \neq \emptyset## separately, because a vector space always has a zero vector. This follows from the other properties. Do you know how?

The Attempt at a Solution



ℙ = { ƒ ∈ F | f(x) = ax3, a ∈ ℝ }

f(0) = a(0)3 = 0 Thus, ℙ is a non-empty set.
There is a difference between a polynomial as a whole and its values at certain points, here ##x=0##. For ##f(x)=ax^3## to be identically zero, it has to be zero for all possible values of ##x##, not only for ##x=0##. Thus is doesn't matter what ##f(0)## is. ##f(x) = 0 \cdot x^3## is the reason there is a zero and ##\mathbb{P}## isn't empty. Which brings us to the next point.
Let g, h ∈ ℙ then,

g(x) = bx3
h(x) = cx3

g + h = g(x) + h(x) = bx3 + cx3 = (b + c)x3

Thus g + h is closed under addition.

Let f ∈ ℙ Λ k ∈ ℝ then,

k⋅f = k⋅f(x) = k(ax3) = ak(x3) = (ak)x3

Thus k⋅f is closed under scalar multiplication.
Of which degree is e.g. ##f(x)= x^3 +2x^2+x+1\,##? And if ##f(x)=0 \cdot x^3## is in the vector space, which degree has it?
So how exactly is the degree of a polynomial defined? Is ##\mathbb{P}## then still a vector space?
 
  • #3
BubblesAreUs said:

Homework Statement


Recall that F is the vector space of functions from ℝ to ℝ, with the usual operations of addition and scalar multiplication of functions. For each of the following subsets of F, write down two functions that belong to the subset, and determine whether or not the subset is a vector subspace of F.

a) The set of polynomials of degree equal to 3.

Homework Equations



Axions: Set ℙ ≠ ∅, ℙ is closed under addition and ℙ is closed under scalar multiplication.
That's axioms
BubblesAreUs said:

The Attempt at a Solution



ℙ = { ƒ ∈ F | f(x) = ax3, a ∈ ℝ }

f(0) = a(0)3 = 0 Thus, ℙ is a non-empty set.

Let g, h ∈ ℙ then,

g(x) = bx3
h(x) = cx3

g + h = g(x) + h(x) = bx3 + cx3 = (b + c)x3

Thus g + h is closed under addition.
Not quite. g + h isn't the set -- it's P. That set is closed under addition.
BubblesAreUs said:
Let f ∈ ℙ Λ k ∈ ℝ then,

k⋅f = k⋅f(x) = k(ax3) = ak(x3) = (ak)x3

Thus k⋅f is closed under scalar multiplication.
Again, P is closed under scalar multipilcation
BubblesAreUs said:
Therefore ℙ is a vector space of F.
I would say that P is a subspace of F.
 
  • #4
BubblesAreUs said:
ℙ = { ƒ ∈ F | f(x) = ax3, a ∈ ℝ }
That is not the set of polynomials of degree 3. The degree is the highest index of x in any term in the polynomial, so the general form of a polynomial of degree 3 is ##ax^3+bx^2+cx+d## where ##a,b,c,d\in F## and ##a\neq 0##.
f(0) = a(0)3 = 0 Thus, ℙ is a non-empty set.
The second statement doesn't appear to follow from the first. Why not just write down a degree-3 polynomial to demonstrate non-emptiness? Choose the simplest one you can think of.

EDIT: I didn't see the above posts when I wrote this. As you were. Read them instead. They have covered all that's needed.
 
  • #5
##\mathbb{R}\cdot x^3## is a vector space. The set of all real polynomials of exactly degree ##3## is not.
 
  • #6
BubblesAreUs said:
The set of polynomials of degree equal to 3.
fresh_42 said:
##\mathbb{R}\cdot x^3## is a vector space. The set of all real polynomials of exactly degree ##3## is not.
Most textbooks I have seen will talk about the space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to some integer value, so I've been a little uncertain about what is meant in this problem; that is, if "exactly 3rd degree" is meant.

In any case, the set of polynomials of degree 3 is a subspace of the space of polynomials of degree <= 3, isn't it?
The set is certainly closed under function addition, as well as scalar multiplication. The only objection I can think of is whether 0x3 belongs to the set.
 
  • #7
That's why I wrote ##\mathbb{R}\cdot x^3## because demanding a leading term of degree three isn't sufficient. ##\mathbb{R}\cdot x^3## solves the problem with zero (which made the OP's conclusions correct). But I stumbled upon this "equal to three" which has been the source of confusion here. One always has to take the polynomials up to degree ##n## to get it closed under addition. I thought I'd better resolve it, before it got worse. It seemed that all of us answered to a different question.
 
  • #8
fresh_42 said:
You probably mean axioms, as axions are hypothetical particles in physics. But these aren't axioms either. It is the definition of a vector space. You don't need to require ##\mathbb{P} \neq \emptyset## separately, because a vector space always has a zero vector. This follows from the other properties. Do you know how?

There is a difference between a polynomial as a whole and its values at certain points, here ##x=0##. For ##f(x)=ax^3## to be identically zero, it has to be zero for all possible values of ##x##, not only for ##x=0##. Thus is doesn't matter what ##f(0)## is. ##f(x) = 0 \cdot x^3## is the reason there is a zero and ##\mathbb{P}## isn't empty. Which brings us to the next point.

Of which degree is e.g. ##f(x)= x^3 +2x^2+x+1\,##? And if ##f(x)=0 \cdot x^3## is in the vector space, which degree has it?
So how exactly is the degree of a polynomial defined? Is ##\mathbb{P}## then still a vector space?

About the empty part. I believe it is nessecary to show that the set is non empty. How else can he take 2 functions in the set and show that a linear combination is also part of the set?

EDIT: I figured you most likely meant that that shouldn't be part of the definition, and then I completely agree.
 
  • #9
Math_QED said:
About the empty part. I believe it is nessecary to show that the set is non empty. How else can he take 2 functions in the set and show that a linear combination is also part of the set?

EDIT: I figured you most likely meant that that shouldn't be part of the definition, and then I completely agree.
(Only a note at the margin:) I'm not completely sure, but I think ##\emptyset## is the basis of ##\{0\}##.
 
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
(Only a note at the margin:) I'm not completely sure, but I think ##\emptyset## is the basis of ##\{0\}##.

Yes that's true. But why does it matter? If the subspace would be the trivial null-vector space, we still have to show that there is an element in the subset (this would be the null vector). The empty set is not a vector space.
 
  • #11
Math_QED said:
But why does it matter?
I haven't said it matters, therefore my remark as a note on the margin. I didn't and don't want to deepen this highly theoretical discussion here, because I don't think it helps the OP.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
  • #12
fresh_42 said:
##\mathbb{R}\cdot x^3## is a vector space.
I haven't seen this notation before. What does it mean?
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
I haven't seen this notation before. What does it mean?
It means ##\mathbb{R} \cdot x^3 = \{f\,\vert \,f=a\cdot x^3 \text{ for an } a \in \mathbb{R}\}##, i.e. the set of all real multiples of ##x^3## or the straight that is spanned by the vector ##x^3##. The same as a one-dimensional real vector space with a basis ##v## can be written as ##\mathbb{R}v##. It avoids the exception for ##f=0## which comes in, if we require the degree of ##f## to be ##3##.
 

FAQ: Determine whether the subset is a vector subspace

What is a vector subspace?

A vector subspace is a subset of a vector space that contains all the properties of a vector space, such as closure under addition and scalar multiplication.

How can I determine whether a subset is a vector subspace?

To determine whether a subset is a vector subspace, you can check if it satisfies the three main properties of a vector subspace: closure under addition, closure under scalar multiplication, and contains the zero vector.

What does it mean for a subset to be closed under addition and scalar multiplication?

A subset that is closed under addition means that if you add any two vectors from the subset, the result will also be in the subset. Similarly, a subset that is closed under scalar multiplication means that if you multiply any vector from the subset by a scalar, the result will also be in the subset.

What is the significance of a subset containing the zero vector when determining if it is a vector subspace?

The zero vector is an essential component of a vector space and is required for the closure properties. If a subset contains the zero vector, it ensures that the subset is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.

Can a subset be a vector subspace if it does not contain the zero vector?

No, a subset cannot be a vector subspace if it does not contain the zero vector. The zero vector is a necessary element for a subset to be considered a vector subspace as it is required for the closure properties.

Back
Top