Determining Analyticity with Cauchy-Riemann Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the analyticity of functions using the Cauchy-Riemann (C-R) equations. The specific functions under consideration are h(z) = x^2 - y^2 - x + i(2xy + y) and h(z) = cos(2x)cosh(2y) - i sin(2x)sinh(2y).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the C-R equations to assess the analyticity of the given functions. There is a focus on whether both equations must hold for a function to be considered analytic, and some participants express confusion regarding the implications of the equations having a negative sign.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the C-R equations and their implications for the analyticity of the functions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which a function is considered analytic, but there is no explicit consensus on the outcomes for the functions in question.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of the C-R equations and their relationship to the concept of analyticity, including the distinction between analytic and antianalytic functions. There is also mention of the wording of the homework question, which raises questions about the interpretation of "those points" where the functions may be analytic.

gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



write down the C-R equations and use them to determine those points at which the following functions are analytic
(i)h(z)=[itex]x^2-y^2-x + i(2xy+y)[/itex]
(ii)h(z)=cos2xcosh2y - isin2xsinh2y

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



ok so C-R equations are for z=u+iv eq1 = [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/itex] and eq2= [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = - \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/itex]

for for (i) i get [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 2x-1 and \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 2x+1[/itex]
and [itex]\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = 2y and \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -2y[/itex] equation 2 holds but equation 1 does not hold. So am i right in thinking the function is not analytic? both equations have to be satisfied right? its the way the question is worded is throwing me "those points" ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A function is "analytic" at a given point if and only if it satisfies the C-R equation in some neighborhood of that point. Here, you are correct that the first function is not analytic for any points and the second function is analytic for all points.
 
and for part (ii) i got the reverse
as in [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/itex]

which leads me to believe this function isn't analytic either...
 
Hi Hallsofivy,
Thanks a million for that. I didnt realize youd got in there between my question and me reply!
So I guess what your saying is it doesn't matter which equation has the negative?
 
gtfitzpatrick said:
So I guess what your saying is it doesn't matter which equation has the negative?

A function is analytic if (slightly hand-wavingly) it only depends on z, and not it's complex conjugate. You can see that in i), your function can be written as [itex]f(z) = z^2 - \bar{z}[/itex], meaning it's not analytic for sure.

If you have the C-R-equations holding with an additional minus sign, then the function only depends on complex conjugate of z (and not z itself). I think people call this kind of functions antianalytic.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K