Determining field between oppositely charged conducting plates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric field between two oppositely charged conducting plates using Gaussian surfaces. Participants are exploring concepts related to electric fields generated by charged plates and the application of Gauss's law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of a cylindrical Gaussian surface to analyze the charge density and electric field between the plates. There are differing interpretations of how to apply Gauss's law and whether the charge density should be halved due to the surface being only partially enclosed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions behind the application of Gauss's law and the implications of removing one of the plates. Some participants express clarity on the reasoning, while others continue to seek understanding of the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a textbook reference that does not align with some participants' interpretations, leading to further exploration of the concepts involved. The discussion includes considerations of how charge distribution changes when one plate is removed.

Natha
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Two large plane parallel conducting plates are given charges of equal magnitude and opposite sign; the surface charge densities are +s and -s. Find the electric field in the region between the plates using Gauss' Law.
Relevant Equations
Gauss' Law ##\phi=\frac{q_{in}}{\epsilon_0}##
I'm using a cylindrical gaussian surface that is right inside the positively charged conducting plate and has the other end in-between both plates. I'm having trouble discerning whether the charge density(##q_{in}##) should be ##\frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0}## since the cylinder is only encompassing one charged surface of the positive plate. However, my textbook (Young physics: Example 22.9 Chapter 22.4 13th edition: pg. 760) has no mention of the 1/2 factor, instead mentioning that ##q_{in}=\sigma A##.

Thank you so much for the help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two ways to look at this.

You can consider the fields the two plates generate independently then add them.
Each generates a field of magnitude ##\frac {\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}## on each side. Between the plates, they add, leading to a magnitude ##\frac {\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##.

The other approach is to recognise that the fields cancel outside the pair of plates, so all the flux is from one plate to the other. A Gaussian box that is half way into one plate and, on its other side, is between the plates, captures all these flux lines. Gauss' law then gives ##\frac {\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##, as before.
 
haruspex said:
There are two ways to look at this.

You can consider the fields the two plates generate independently then add them.
Each generates a field of magnitude ##\frac {\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}## on each side. Between the plates, they add, leading to a magnitude ##\frac {\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##.

The other approach is to recognise that the fields cancel outside the pair of plates, so all the flux is from one plate to the other. A Gaussian box that is half way into one plate and, on its other side, is between the plates, captures all these flux lines. Gauss' law then gives ##\frac {\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##, as before.
Expect push back on this. I was about to post a reply challenging "Each generates a field of magnitude ##\frac {\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}## on each side." but thinking it through, you are correct. You won't get this result using Gauss's Law, but you will get it applying Coulomb's Law and integration.
 
Hi! Thank you all for your reply,

I'm still having trouble seeing how using the below setup (focusing on the Gaussian surface S1) can reveal the total magnitude of the electric force between the plates, ##\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##. Wouldn't you get the same result ##\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##, regardless of whether the second plate exists?

Edit: ohh, I just realized something. Is the reason why this works because if you remove the second surface, the positive charges will spread out on both sides of the conductor, thus resulting in charge density inside the Gaussian surface S1 to be ##\frac{\sigma A}{2}##?
Screenshot 2024-02-03 at 9.25.17 PM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Natha said:
Edit: ohh, I just realized something. Is the reason why this works because if you remove the second surface, the positive charges will spread out on both sides of the conductor, thus resulting in charge density inside the Gaussian surface S1 to be ##\frac{\sigma A}{2}##?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natha and MatinSAR
Bingo! Nice to see a good aha moment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natha and TSny
Wonderful! Thank you all so much for your help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K