Three parallel plates -- find the electric field

In summary: I don't know what they are. They are not actual plates, they are just two pieces of paper with some charges on them.In summary, the student attempted to find an answer to a homework problem involving fields inside a metal enclosure, but was not sure if a cylinder or a cube was the right geometry. After doing some calculations, he found that the field was always zero inside the metal plates.
  • #1
ln(
42
0

Homework Statement


Find the field at A.
three-plates-exam-jpg.jpg


Homework Equations


##\oint E\cdot dA = Q_{enclosed}/\epsilon_0##

The Attempt at a Solution


My first intuition was to do a Gaussian cylinder from A to the middle of the bottom plate. My logic is that the field inside the bottom plate is 0, so I'd have (from Gauss' Law) ##E(\pi r^2) = (10 - 2 - 1)\sigma \pi r^2/\epsilon_0##, so ##E = 7\sigma / \epsilon_0##. However, the correct answer is with a coefficient of 1.5, which I get if I do a Gaussian cylinder from A to D.
This also got me thinking: if I do a Gaussian cylinder from middle of the top plate to the middle of the bottom plate, my understanding is that field is 0 at the top and bottom of my Gaussian surface. Yet, ##E(2\pi r^2) = (10 - 1 - 1)\sigma \pi r^2/ \epsilon_0## and this suggests to me that field is nonzero inside the plates. What is wrong with my understanding here? Does this suggest that field is nonzero inside the plates?
 

Attachments

  • three-plates-exam-jpg.jpg
    three-plates-exam-jpg.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 2,899
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am not sure a cylinder is the right geometry for this problem. Maybe you need a cube.

For sure, if the plates are made of metal then the field is always zero inside them.
 
  • #3
The straightforward way to do this is first to use Gauss's Law once to find a general expression for the field due to one plate with surface charge density σ. Then just use superposition for the field in any region. A vector diagram of the direction of the field due to each plate in the region of interest would be extremely helpful.
 
  • #4
Slight aside: when calculating ##\sigma## here, is this ##Q/A## where ##A## is the area of one side of the sheet? Or does this include both sides together? What I mean by this is: if a plate contained 4 C of charge, and one face of the plate was 2 m^2 in area, would ##sigma## equal 1 or 2 (coulombs/m^2)?
I ask because, here, it seems that sigma is calculated using total charge / area of one face. However, in the last example on this page (https://physics.info/law-gauss/), it seems to be calculated as total charge / area of both faces. Which is correct/the more typical convention?
 
  • #5
The comment by @Gene Naden is a distraction. If you had conducting plates, the figure would be showing different charge densities on the two sides of each plate, so it is a good assumption that the given charge distributions are not free to move. Therefore, if you draw the standard Gaussian pillbox through the plate, the enclosed charge is qencl = σ dA where dA is the area of the face. There are two faces through which electric field lines pass so the electric flux is Φ = 2 E dA.
ln( said:
However, in the last example on this page (https://physics.info/law-gauss/), it seems to be calculated as total charge / area of both faces. Which is correct/the more typical convention?
It's not a matter of convention; it's a matter of what you have here as indicated in the figure. You have case I, "planar symmetry nonconducting plane of infinitesimal thickness with uniform surface charge density σ".
 
  • #6
kuruman said:
The comment by @Gene Naden is a distraction. If you had conducting plates, the figure would be showing different charge densities on the two sides of each plate, so it is a good assumption that the given charge distributions are not free to move. Therefore, if you draw the standard Gaussian pillbox through the plate, the enclosed charge is qencl = σ dA where dA is the area of the face. There are two faces through which electric field lines pass so the electric flux is Φ = 2 E dA.

It's not a matter of convention; it's a matter of what you have here as indicated in the figure. You have case I, "planar symmetry nonconducting plane of infinitesimal thickness with uniform surface charge density σ".
But, for instructive purposes, wouldn't the field of case 2 be half their answer?
I get this with ##E(2\pi r^2) = \sigma \pi r^2 / \epsilon_0## using a gaussian cylinder extending above the thick plate to below it.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
ln( said:
wouldn't the field of case 2 be half their answer?
Their case 2 is just case 1 doubled up. Each surface of the thick plate is equivalent to the infinitely thin sheet. Since each face has the same charge density as in case 1, any given area of the thick sheet carries twice the charge.
 
  • #8
The problem statement is confusing. On which sides are the indicated surface charges? For example, is the surface charge +5σ on the top and another +5σ on the bottom, or is there zero charge on the bottom, or ...?
 
  • #9
rude man said:
On which sides are the indicated surface charges?
The "plates" are not conductors. They are infinitesimally thin distributions of "pasted on" charges. That's why the + and - signs are drawn as they are.
 
  • #10
Extra credit to OP: what if the top charge layer had been -2σ instead of -σ, the others the same as before?
 

1. What is a three parallel plate system?

A three parallel plate system is a set up of three flat conducting plates that are placed parallel to each other with equal distance between them. These plates are used to study the electric field and its properties.

2. How do you determine the electric field in a three parallel plate system?

The electric field in a three parallel plate system can be determined using the formula E = V/d, where E is the electric field, V is the potential difference between the plates, and d is the distance between the plates.

3. What is the direction of the electric field in a three parallel plate system?

The electric field in a three parallel plate system is always directed from the positive plate towards the negative plate. This is because the positive plate has a higher potential and the negative plate has a lower potential.

4. How does the distance between the plates affect the electric field?

The distance between the plates directly affects the electric field. As the distance increases, the electric field decreases, and vice versa. This is because the potential difference between the plates decreases with increasing distance, according to the formula E = V/d.

5. What are some real-life applications of a three parallel plate system?

A three parallel plate system is commonly used in capacitors, which are essential components in electronic circuits. They are also used in particle accelerators and in scientific experiments to study the properties of electric fields. Additionally, three parallel plate systems are used in electrostatic precipitators to remove pollutants from industrial emissions.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
218
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
275
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
700
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
833
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
218
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
424
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
498
Back
Top