Determining Molar Absorptivity of Iron-Dye Complex at 660nm

  • Thread starter Thread starter scantor145
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the molar absorptivity of an iron-dye complex using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 660nm. Two solutions are prepared: Solution 1, an acidic buffer containing Chromazurol B and ferric chloride, and Solution 2, which includes a neutral buffer to alter the pH. The procedure involves measuring absorbance at varying concentrations, applying the Beer-Lambert Law to derive the molar absorptivity from the slope of the linear fit. Key considerations include the stability of Fe(II) at higher pH levels and ensuring the concentration of the chromophore is accurately known.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UV-VIS spectrophotometry
  • Knowledge of Beer-Lambert Law
  • Familiarity with buffer solutions and pH effects
  • Experience in preparing and diluting chemical solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stability of Fe(II) in various pH environments
  • Learn about the preparation of calibration curves for spectrophotometric analysis
  • Investigate the role of chelators in stabilizing metal ions in solution
  • Explore advanced techniques for measuring molar absorptivity with UV-VIS spectrophotometers
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, laboratory technicians, and researchers involved in analytical chemistry, particularly those working with metal-dye complexes and spectrophotometric methods.

scantor145
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need help in devising a procedure to determine the molar absorptivity of an iron-dye complex in two solutions at a wavelength of 660nm. I have a UV-VIS spectrophotometer.

Solution 1 is an acidic buffer (R1) containing the iron-binding dye Chromazurol B and ferric chloride. Some amount of an iron standard will be added to this solution, hopefully forming a colored complex with the dye.

Solution 2 is Solution 1 with the addition of a neutral buffer (R2) raising the pH. I believe the molar absorptivity will change under varying pH. Accounting for dilution of Solution 1 would have to be taken into account.

The ratios of the volumes of iron standard to R1 to R2 are 16:200:60.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You need to know the concentration of your chromophore precisely (level of precision depends on needs/goals of course). Get a baseline corrected absorbance measurement at the λmax for a range of concentrations. Plot absorbance as a function of concentration. Do a linear least squares fit. According to the Beer-Lambert Law, the slope of this line is the extinction coefficient (molar absorptivity) mulitplied by the path length.

A very simple procedure. The most difficult part most times is being able to know the concentration of the analyte very precisely.

Also why would you add Iron to solution 1 if you already have ferric chloride? Do you need to add Fe(II) for the complex to form?

Also why not just make a new solution 2 instead of diluting with buffer? If the extinction coefficient is not so high, you may dilute the analyte below a measurable absorbance.

Typically you want to measure absorbances between 0.1-1.0 AU (and your calibration curve should cover atleast that much range), but this depends on the instrument you are using.

I just thought of another thing, if you are indeed using Fe(II) in aqueous solutions, you need to keep the pH pretty acidic. Fe(II) is not very stable above ~pH 4 (IIRC), quickly oxidizes to Fe(III) and precipitates out as rust. Chelators help to stop this but pH affects chelation depending on what you are using. Just a few things off the top of my head for you to keep in mind.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K