Determining the Electric Radiation Field for a Subsequent Time?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the electric radiation field from a specific equation in the context of electromagnetic theory, particularly focusing on the transition from one equation to another as outlined in provided notes. The subject area involves concepts related to electric fields, spherical coordinates, and vector calculus in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transition from an initial equation for the electric field to a specific equation in the notes, questioning the correctness of their calculations and assumptions regarding vector components and cross products.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made attempts to manipulate the equations and express the vectors in different forms, while others have raised concerns about potential errors in the notes. There is ongoing exploration of how to express the electric field at subsequent times, with some guidance offered regarding the dependence on angles and retarded time.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of determining the electric field at a later time and the need to consider the position of the particle and observation point in relation to the retarded time. There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions and relationships of the vectors involved.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading:
http://physics.usask.ca/~hirose/p812/notes/Ch8.pdf

How do you go from

[itex]\vec{E} (r,t) = \frac{e}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{c \kappa^3 R} \hat{n}<br /> \times ( \hat{n} \times \dot{ \beta})[/itex]

to Eq. 8.46 on page 9

it seems to me that at t=0 we have [itex]\dot{\beta} = ( |\dot{\beta}|, 0 ,0)[/itex] in spherical co-ordinates. and the normal vector in some arbitrary direction is [itex](1, \theta, \phi)[/itex]

for circular motion you have the cross product between velocity and acceleration disappearing so

[itex]\hat{n} \times (\hat{n} \times \dot{\beta}) = |\dot{\beta}| (\theta^2 - \phi^2, \theta, \phi)[/itex]

Not Eq. 8.46 - so I must be doing something very wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Gregg said:
[itex]\vec{E} (r,t) = \frac{e}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{c \kappa^3 R} \hat{n}<br /> \times ( \hat{n} \times \dot{ \beta})[/itex]
It says [itex]\vec{E} (r,t) = \frac{e}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{c \kappa^3 R} \hat{n}<br /> \times ( (\hat{n}-\beta) \times \dot{ \beta})[/itex]
 
In this case the cross product with [itex]\beta \times \dot{\beta} = 0[/itex] so I remove terms with [itex]\beta[/itex] in in both equations...

[itex](r, \theta, \phi) = (0, - \cos \theta \cos \phi, \sin \phi)[/itex] would be the vector part in Eq. 8.46.

Also I think I might have the order of the angles in that vector in the wrong order, but my result is still nothing like 8.46
 
Gregg said:
In this case the cross product with [itex]\beta \times \dot{\beta} = 0[/itex]
The text says they're orthogonal, not collinear.
 
OK well either way that's not the problem I can't get to 8.46, do you know how it's donei.e. even with [itex]\beta \times \dot{\beta} = 0[/itex] I don't get

[itex]n \times (n \times \dot{\beta}) = (0, -\cos \theta \cos \phi, \sin \phi)[/itex]

which is what would happen if you removed the [itex]-\beta[/itex] from the bracket?

(I removed terms with [itex]\beta |\dot{\beta}|[/itex] )

I'm beginning to think that there is a mistake in these notes since this vector looks like it has no magnitude, and there are terms which look Cartesian, and it says Cartesian above 8.46.

Do you need values of those vectors beta at t=t'? I'm not quite sure which they refer to
 
Last edited:
With that:

[itex]n=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> \cos \phi \sin \theta \\<br /> \sin \phi \sin \theta \\<br /> \cos \theta<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]


[itex]\beta =\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 0 \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> \beta <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

[itex] \dot{\beta} =\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> |\dot{\beta} | \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

so for

[itex]n\times( (n-\beta) \times \dot{\beta})[/itex]

I get

[itex] <br /> (\cos \theta - \beta) \cos \theta \hat{e}_x + \sin^2\theta \sin \phi \cos \phi \hat{e}_y + (\beta-\cos \theta) \sin \theta \cos \phi \hat{e}_z[/itex]
 
So does anyone know how you get to 8.46?
 
Gregg said:
so for

[itex]n\times( (n-\beta) \times \dot{\beta})[/itex]

I get

[itex] <br /> (\cos \theta - \beta) \cos \theta \hat{e}_x + \sin^2\theta \sin \phi \cos \phi \hat{e}_y + (\beta-\cos \theta) \sin \theta \cos \phi \hat{e}_z[/itex]

I don't think this is the correct expression. There are some sign errors. In addition, the coefficient of ##\hat{e}_x## has a term missing.

It might be better to begin by expanding the vectors ##\beta## and ##\dot{\beta}## in terms of the unit vectors ##\hat{n}##, ##\hat{e}_\theta##, and ##\hat{e}_\phi##. Then evaluate [itex]n\times( (n-\beta) \times \dot{\beta})[/itex]. Use of a Computer Algebra System program will make life easier.
 
I managed to get the right answer. So this is for the time t' here? This happens to be set to zero. How would I find the [itex]E_{\text{rad}} (r,t)[/itex] field for subsequent time? The function does not seem to be of time. Say if you wanted the field as some time [itex]t=t_r+\frac{R}{c}[/itex] ?

I guess if the field is what you want at some point a distance R away, t=t' will suffice correct?

By the way to anyone interested: you can do the cross products by doing it first in Cartesian basis and then switching to the spherical basis.
 
  • #10
Gregg said:
How would I find the [itex]E_{\text{rad}} (r,t)[/itex] field for subsequent time? The function does not seem to be of time.

The time dependence of equation 8.46 is in the angles ##\theta## and ##\phi## as well as the in the unit vectors ##\hat{e}_\theta## and ##\hat{e}_\phi##. These quantities are changing with time. They are determined by the position of the particle on the circle at the retarded time and the location of the observation point relative to particle. It looks very complicated to me. If you want ##\vec{E}(r,t)## at some selected observation time ##t##, you would need to determine the location of the particle on the circle at the corresponding retarded time ##t\:'##. Then you can use equation 8.46 for the particular ##\theta##, ##\phi##, ##\hat{e}_\theta## and ##\hat{e}_\phi## that would be defined for that location of the particle on the circle and the location of the observation point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K