Determining the mass of a photon travelling at the speed of light

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of photon mass, specifically in the context of a photon traveling at the speed of light with a given frequency. Participants are exploring the appropriate equations to use in calculations related to photon mass and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the applicability of various equations, such as KE = 0.5mv^2 and E=mc^2, in the context of photons. There is a discussion about the distinction between rest mass and momentum, as well as the concept of relativistic mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of photons, noting that they have zero rest mass and discussing the implications for kinetic energy calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations of classical equations when applied to massless particles like photons.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the use of certain equations and the nature of mass in the context of relativistic physics. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding the properties of photons.

Solidmozza
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I'm just wondering about this when you are making calculations of photon mass. For instance, determining the mass of a photon traveling at the speed of light and having a frequency of 100 Hz. Which equation do you use, KE = 0.5mv^2 or do you use E=mc^2 (both in conjunction with the E=hf formula).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A photon has no mass to speak of, because most of the time when we say mass, we mean "rest mass". The photon has zero rest mass.

What the photon does have is momentum. You can work out the momentum of the photon with De Broglie's equation [tex]p = \frac{h}{\lambda}[/tex].

Some people speak of "relativistic mass" which is the apparent mass gained because of motion. AFAIK, this concept has fallen out of favor, but if you want to compute the "relativistic mass" of a photon, you can do so by using [tex]E = pc = \frac{hc}{\lambda} = h\nu[/tex] together with [tex]E = mc^2[/tex] to determine m.

[tex]E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex] is a Newtonian approximation that only works for objects with rest mass at speeds of v<<c. It definitely does not work for photons or any object traveling close to the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
First, photon has no mass.
Second, answer from those equations are only differ by 1/2. (Can you see that?)
 
Solidmozza said:
I'm just wondering about this when you are making calculations of photon mass. For instance, determining the mass of a photon traveling at the speed of light and having a frequency of 100 Hz. Which equation do you use, KE = 0.5mv^2 or do you use E=mc^2 (both in conjunction with the E=hf formula).
[itex]KE=.5mv^2[/itex] is the energy acquired by a body with rest mass being accelerated from 0 to non-relativistic speed v. Kinetic energy does not apply to a photon. A photon has no rest mass and always travels at c. Its energy, [itex]E = h\nu = hc/\lambda = mc^2[/itex]. Photon momentum is [itex]p = mc = h/\lambda[/itex]

AM

PS. Sorry about duplicating previous posts which, for some reason, I missed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K