Determining work of a 3 particle system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a particle leaving the surface of a spherical asteroid with a specific speed and gravitational conditions. The user initially applies conservation of energy equations but arrives at an incorrect height above the asteroid's surface. They realize that using the gravitational potential energy formula U=-(GmM)/r is necessary due to varying gravitational acceleration. The user seeks confirmation on whether this approach will yield the correct answer, which is known to be 250,000 meters above the surface. The thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying gravitational concepts in energy calculations.
Dusty912
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


on a spherical astroid with a radius of 500km and an acceleration due to gravity of 3.0m/s2
How far from the surface will a particle go if it leaves the asteroid’s surface with a radial speed of 1000m/s?

Homework Equations


conservation of energy
Ui + ki=Uf +kf
U=-(GmM)/r
K=(1/2)mv2
-------------------------
f=ma
-(GmM)/r2=ma
-(GM)/r2=a
-(GM)/r=ar
(can apply to h height)

r=radius of astroid
h=height above center
m=mass of rocket
M=mass of astroid
G=gravitational constant
a=acceleration due to asteroids gravity

The Attempt at a Solution


Ui + ki=Uf +kf
Ui + ki=Uf + 0
-(GmM)/r +(1/2)mvi2=-(GmM)/h
the m masses cancel
-(GM)/r +(1/2)vi2=-(GM)/h
-ar +(1/2)vi2=-ah
r-(1/2)(1/a)vi2=h
plugging in the values gives me
500000m+(1/2)(1/(3m/s2)(1000m/s2)2=h

5166666.667meters from the center of the astroid. so 166666.667 meters above its surface. Which is the incorrect answer. the right answer is 250000 meters above the surface.

I know this should be a pretty simple problem, Not too sure where I went wrong. Thanks ahead of time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay so I realized that I cannot use mgh fro the U final because the acceleration due to gravity is different here. So I found the mass of the astroid. If I use U=-(GmM)/r and solve for h will I get the correct answer?

and btw the title is wrong for this post.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K