Deviations of conservation laws in cosmological evolution?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of energy conservation in General Relativity (GR) within the context of an expanding universe. It establishes that while local energy conservation holds true, there is no well-defined global energy conservation in general curved spacetimes. The conversation highlights that deviations from strict conservation laws do not manifest in the formation of large-scale structures like galaxy clusters, as local processes maintain energy conservation. A referenced blog post by Sean Carroll further elucidates these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the stress-energy tensor
  • Knowledge of local versus global conservation laws
  • Concept of tidal forces in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Energy is Not Conserved" by Sean Carroll
  • Explore the implications of the stress-energy tensor in GR
  • Investigate the role of tidal forces in cosmic structure formation
  • Study the mathematical framework of energy conservation in curved spacetimes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and cosmologists interested in the implications of General Relativity on energy conservation and the evolution of large-scale structures in the universe.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Deviations of conservation laws in the context of cosmological evolution?
If energy is "not conserved" in General Relativity (or at least, it is difficult to define it) in the context of an expanding accelerating spacetime (like it happens in our Universe), are there any observations of deviations from the strict conservation laws in the evolution and formation of large scale structures (like clusters or superclusters of galaxies for instance)?

For example, in some articles about the study of galaxies and clusters evolutions and formations, sometimes the effects of the "tidal force" from spacetime expansion is considered... Has the expansion changed the energy or momentum of these systems somehow?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
If energy is "not conserved" in General Relativity
This doesn't mean what it seems to mean.

When you think of "energy conservation", you're probably thinking of local energy conservation: roughly speaking, that energy can't be created or destroyed in any local process. That is still true in GR; its mathematical expression is that the covariant divergence of the stress-energy tensor is zero.

What "energy is not conserved" in GR actually means is that, except for certain special cases (of which our expanding universe is not one), there is no well-defined global energy that is conserved. But that doesn't mean you can make a perpetual motion machine or get free energy from nothing. All it means is that general curved spacetimes don't have a certain mathematical property that many physicists think it would be "nice" to have.

Suekdccia said:
are there any observations of deviations from the strict conservation laws in the evolution and formation of large scale structures (like clusters or superclusters of galaxies for instance)?
No. These are all local processes and, as above, local energy conservation holds in GR. For example, the energy radiated away as a bound system (say a star) forms is exactly equal to the decrease in the externally measured mass of the system.

Suekdccia said:
in some articles about the study of galaxies and clusters evolutions and formations, sometimes the effects of the "tidal force" from spacetime expansion is considered
Can you give a reference?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K