Diagonalizing a matrix using perturbation theory.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
PsychoDash
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the following Hamiltonian.

H=[itex]\begin{pmatrix} 20 & 1 & 0 \\1 & 20 & 2 \\0 & 2 & 30 \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
Diagonalize this matrix using perturbation theory. Obtain eigenvectors (to first order) and eigenvalues (to second order).

Ho=[itex]\begin{pmatrix} 20 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 20 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 30 \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
H'=[itex]\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\1 & 0 & 2 \\0 & 2 & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



In general, diagonalizing a matrix involves finding its eigenvalues and then writing the eigenvalues on the diagonal with zeros elsewhere. Despite that, I'm just not sure how to approach this question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shanifari
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you calculate corrections in perturbation theory? What equations do you have? Do you have degenerate states?

It's really just a matter of figuring out which formulas you need to use and plugging everything in. You can get the needed matrix elements by inspection.
 
That's what's throwing me off. There is no "physical system" as I have come to understand it. All I'm given is what I wrote above. I understand that to calculate perturbations in general, you use <Psi|H'|Psi>, but that gets me back to needing a wavefunction to operate on. All I have is this set of matrices.
 
You don't need a wave function for the system. You need the eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. Let's call those [itex]\vert 1 \rangle[/itex], [itex]\vert 2 \rangle[/itex], and [itex]\vert 3 \rangle[/itex]. The matrix you've been given is the representation of [itex]\hat{H}[/itex] relative to that basis. In other words,
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}<br /> \langle 1 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 1 \rangle & \langle 1 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 2 \rangle & \langle 1 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 3 \rangle \\<br /> \langle 2 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 1 \rangle & \langle 2 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 2 \rangle & \langle 2 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 3 \rangle \\<br /> \langle 3 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 1 \rangle & \langle 3 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 2 \rangle & \langle 3 \lvert \hat{H} \rvert 3 \rangle<br /> \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 20 & 1 & 0 \\1 & 20 & 2 \\0 & 2 & 30 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]
Does that clear things up?
 
How does that help diagonalize H?