Diagonalizing Matrix A: Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, Matrix P & D

  • Thread starter Thread starter xicor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagonalization
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
xicor
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex] A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & -1\\ 0 & 0 & 2\end{array}[/tex]

a) Find the eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of matrix A.
b)Find the matrix P that diagonalizes A.
c)Find the diagonal matrix D suh that A = PDP-1, and verify the equality.
d) Find the orthogonal matrix P that diagonalizes A.
e) Compute A4

Homework Equations



A = PDP-1,
AP = DP
A-I[tex]\lambda[/tex] = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



First I started by finding the eigenvalues values where [tex]\lambda[/tex]=1 multipity two, 2. After this I tried finding the eigenvectors that form P and got v1=[0,-1,1] from [tex]\lambda[/tex]=2 , and {v2, v3} = {[0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1]}. From this I constructed the P matrix and got [tex] P=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & 0\\ -1 & 1 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 1\end{array}[/tex] and [tex] D=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}2 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{array}[/tex] and this is where I get confused. The P matrix doesn't work in the form AP = PD and you can't find the inverse of P since the top row is all zeros. Once I figure this out, parts d and e should be straight-forward. Can someone point me to where I'm making a mistake here please. Thanks to everybody who helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, then there is something I'm possibly missing about eigenvectors. The first eigenvector was found by plugging [tex]\lambda[/tex] = 2 into the (A - I[tex]\lambda[/tex]) matrix producing [tex] \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}[/tex] which gives the equations x1 = 0 and x2 = -x3 and constructing the vector from x3 gives x3[0, -1, 1] where the first eigenvector v1 = [0, -1, 1]. I then used the other eigenvalue [tex]\lambda[/tex] = 1 and found the matrix [tex] \begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}[/tex] and the way I'm interpreting the book's reasoning for dealing with these matrixes, the eigenvectors that form would be x2[0, 1, 0] + x3[0, 0, 1] which are also the eigenvectors. Clearly there is something different I need to do when dealing with this kind of matrix.