Uncovering the Truth: Jupiter's Core Revealed as Solid Diamond by Tammy Ma

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KevinMcHugh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Diamond Jupiter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Tammy Ma's recent article in Scientific American asserts that Jupiter's core is solid diamond, based on her research utilizing high-powered lasers. Despite her reputation as a scientist, the discussion reveals a lack of published evidence supporting this claim, with no consensus in the scientific community regarding its validity. Critics emphasize the need for peer-reviewed research to substantiate such extraordinary claims, particularly in light of existing data from NASA's Juno mission that may contradict the diamond core hypothesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary geology and core composition
  • Familiarity with laser technology in scientific research
  • Knowledge of NASA's Juno mission and its findings on Jupiter
  • Ability to interpret peer-reviewed scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of NASA's Juno mission findings on Jupiter's gravity harmonics
  • Examine peer-reviewed articles on the composition of gas giant cores
  • Investigate the use of high-powered lasers in planetary science
  • Explore the historical context of the diamond core hypothesis in planetary formation theories
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, planetary scientists, and anyone interested in the composition of gas giants and the methodologies used in contemporary planetary research.

KevinMcHugh
Messages
32
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Title says it all.
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
KevinMcHugh said:
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
My though is that when you ask about an article, you should post a link to the article.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath, DaveE, berkeman and 1 other person
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagopbul
KevinMcHugh said:
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
Go to the web page where you read this. Click-Drag to copy the address (starts with "http://" or similar) in the address bar of your browser, and paste it into a reply here.

Also, it's best if you can find where in the article they link to the original peer-reviewed article, please also post a copy of that link here. We prefer to read the original paper, rather than the popoular press' interpretation of the scientific paper. Thanks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath, Bystander, phinds and 1 other person
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath, phinds and berkeman
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KevinMcHugh
BillTre said:
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KevinMcHugh, phinds and BillTre
PAllen said:
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
 
  • #10
Dragrath said:
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
This is not a field I know much about. I just did some internet searching because it seemed the OP wasn't going to. I found that the diamond core idea appeared to be taken seriously as a 'possibility' by many in the field, however I cannot speak to the specifics of your question.
 
  • #11
I would expect that gravity is sufficient to deform even a solid core over long distances, just like everywhere else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
860
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K