Did Bush really say these things? :O

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion critiques the intelligence and communication skills of former President George W. Bush, highlighting his frequent verbal gaffes and lack of self-awareness when speaking. Participants express a desire for a more competent leader, noting that Bush's comments often reflect a misunderstanding of key issues, such as confusing Osama bin Laden with Saddam Hussein. The conversation also touches on the broader political landscape, contrasting Republican and Democratic ideologies, particularly regarding taxation and social values. Additionally, there is a sense of frustration with the perceived ineffectiveness of both parties in addressing the needs of the American public. Overall, the thread underscores a longing for leadership that demonstrates greater intelligence and clarity.
  • #31
Outcast said:
Gokul43201 Our election is based on The Electoral College System and not the popular vote.

Thank you for teaching me about the Electoral College. It's where the voters go after Electoral High School, right ? Now I understand everything.

And perhaps you have me confused with waste, who said that the people determine the President. I was going to point out that they really don't, and that it's the EC that does.

Hmmm...so how does your big, red map reflect the electoral votes ?

(except for small variations, one can use that map for population density...like this one below)

[url]http://www.cast.uark.edu/local/catalog/national/images/maps/Population.dir/USpop1990.gif[/url]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Is there a correlation between intelligence and the density of population where you live ? I do think there is :-p
 
  • #33
Monique said:
No, he won 5.9% of the vote, as the stats make clear. No, 16 million more people voted for Bush than Gore.
Are you missing the word "by" in that first sentence?

Anyway, its interesting that by population (voting and non-voting) Bush had more people than Gore. I've never thought about it before, but if you have kids, should you get an extra vote...?
 
  • #34
russ_watters said:
Anyway, its interesting that by population (voting and non-voting) Bush had more people than Gore.

I'll bet he has Utah to thank for some of that. :biggrin: What's their birth-rate like ?
 
  • #35
russ_watters said:
if you have kids, should you get an extra vote...?
This is ridiculous, nobody ever implied that, because kids are not supposed to understand politics, so it has been established they have no right to vote. You perfecly understand the point without needing any explanation.

In indirect systems, it may occur that the elected president was chosen by only a minority of people having the right to give their vote.

Did anyone need this clarification ?
 
  • #36
This is the very basis of democraty by the way. Democratic systems are already not perfect. There is no need to flaw them even more by introducing several levels in the election process.

What is this doing in GD ?
 
  • #37
humanino said:
Is there a correlation between intelligence and the density of population where you live ? I do think there is :-p
Gee it that's true, them maybe I should have gone to prison instead of college.
:smile: http://www.coursework.info/i/41627.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Outcast said:
Overcrowding prisons has been an rising issue in American society.
:smile:
One has plenty of time to study there :rolleyes:
 
  • #39
humanino said:
This is ridiculous, nobody ever implied that, because kids are not supposed to understand politics, so it has been established they have no right to vote.

Should adults who don't understand politics also have no vote then ?

:-p :-p

cheers,
Patrick.
 
  • #40
I guess, they could dice-vote. That would be better. :-p
 
  • #41
vanesch said:
Should adults who don't understand politics also have no vote then ?

:-p :-p
I've always been against voting for that very reason.
 
  • #42
vanesch said:
Should adults who don't understand politics also have no vote then ?

:-p :-p

cheers,
Patrick.

They have a statistically accepted capability to understand the impact of their vote. That some choose not to, is a different matter.

Back to Bushisms, here's the latest :

"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a hat." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2004

"Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —George W. Bush, Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004

Here's the video :

http://politicalhumor.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=politicalhumor&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.buzzflash.com%2F04%2F09%2Fbushlove.wmv
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #43
Has anyone done "They misunderestimated me!" yet?
 
  • #44
That has now gone beyond the limited realm of a Bushism, and is gradually making it's way into mainstream English. Soon everyone will be misunderestimating like crazy. :-p
 
  • #45
Gokul43201 said:
That has now gone beyond the limited realm of a Bushism, and is gradually making it's way into mainstream English. Soon everyone will be misunderestimating like crazy. :-p
thats pretty daft aint it, i usualy miunderestimated my opponants in hockey, the only reason I'm better is that they misunderestimate me far worse, hehe
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
14K