MHB Did I Calculate the Perimeter of A Sector Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perimeter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the perimeter of a sector with a radius of 5 inches and an angle of 30°. The initial calculation yielded a perimeter of 10.05 inches, which was incorrect. The correct formula involves converting the angle to radians and applying it properly, resulting in a perimeter of 12.62 inches. The error was identified in the computation method used for the angle conversion. The final confirmation shows that the correct perimeter is indeed 12.62 inches.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
A sector has the following:

radius = 5 inches

angle = 30°

I was told to use the formula in the picture.

My answer is P = 10.05 inches.

The book's answer is P = 12.62 inches.

Am I using the right formula?

View attachment 7891
 

Attachments

  • sDraw_2018-03-02_01-42-29.png
    sDraw_2018-03-02_01-42-29.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 110
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
A sector has the following:

radius = 5 inches

angle = 30°

I was told to use the formula in the picture.

My answer is P = 10.05 inches.

The book's answer is P = 12.62 inches.

Am I using the right formula?

It looks like you have performed this computation: $(2 \pi / 360) (30)(2\pi / 360)(5) + (2)(5)$ instead of $(2 \pi / 360) (30)(5) + (2)(5)$

Remember: $\theta$ in degrees is equal to $\theta \cdot \dfrac{2\pi}{360}$ (or simply $\theta \cdot \dfrac{\pi}{180}$) in radians.
 
I converted 30° to radians before using the formula. This was my error.

P = (30/360) • (2π)(5) + 2(5)

P = (1/12)((10π) + 10

P = 12.62 inches

I got it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top