Did I define this correctly? (IUPAC System of nomenclature)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correct application of the IUPAC system of nomenclature for organic compounds, specifically regarding the naming of a compound identified as 2-chloro,4-ethyl heptane. Participants explore the structural representation and naming conventions associated with the compound.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the -CH2-CH group at the 4-position can be accurately identified as ethyl.
  • Another participant asserts that they are to assume it is ethyl for the sake of the discussion.
  • A later reply acknowledges the omission of hydrogen atoms in the ethyl group, indicating a need for clarification in the structural representation.
  • One participant concludes they have found the answer independently, suggesting a resolution to their inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains some uncertainty regarding the identification of the group at the 4-position as ethyl, with differing interpretations presented. No consensus is reached on the nomenclature issue.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that the ethyl group is correctly represented without explicitly detailing the hydrogen atoms, which may affect clarity in nomenclature.

Cyclopse
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Just to be sure, is this:

2-chloro,4-ethyl heptane ?

edit- i noticed i left out the hydrogens in the ethyl, pretend they r there :)

wthpip.jpg
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You have a -CH2-CH group at the 4-position. Is that ethyl?
 
We are asked to pretend it IS ethyl.
 
chemisttree said:
You have a -CH2-CH group at the 4-position. Is that ethyl?

yes, i forgot to finish the H"s
 
nevermind, I have found the answer. Thank you anyway!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K