Did I Make Mistakes in Calculating the Potential of a Charged Sphere?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Neolight

Homework Statement


A sphere of radius R has a volume charge density proportional to distance from center. Total charge contained in the sphere is Q. If electric potential at infinity is taken to be zero , potential at it's center is

Homework Equations


Here given are
ρ= βr where β is a constant

The Attempt at a Solution


Since in this question the charger density is not uniform so I attempted the question by first finding out the electric field on the inside and outside region by using Gauss law than.

IMG_20171101_002557.jpg


IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
Please give me some hints on what I have done wrong because the answer is
V= Q/3Πξ.R
And I also think that somehow we have to find the value of β

And one final personal question
Is this question a difficult level question because I have spent like 2 hours in a day for 4 days and haven't been able to answer due to mistakes here and there and lately because of this I have started losing confidence in myself because I can't even solve this question.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
    IMG_20171101_003427.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 488
  • IMG_20171101_002557.jpg
    IMG_20171101_002557.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 385
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't want to read your sideways picture, but ## Q=\int\limits_{0}^{R} \beta r \, 4 \pi r^2 dr ##. That will allow you to find ## \beta ##. You then need to find ## E(r) ##, (by Gauss' law), as a function of ## r ## both inside and outside the sphere. That will allow you to compute ## V(r)=-\int\limits_{+\infty}^{r} E(r') \, dr' ##. ## \\ ## Maybe I'm a little fussy, but I think it is asking a lot to have someone need to turn their computer sideways to try and read a sideways picture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg


I'm really sorry about that tilted photos.
Here are my calculations
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
    IMG_20171101_002557_01.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 808
  • IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg
    IMG_20171101_003427_01.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 806
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
It looks quite accurate. The equation ## \beta \pi R^4=Q ## applies, so that ## \beta=Q/( \pi R^4) ##. You basically computed this, but didn't include it. You can substitute this for ## \beta ## in your final answer. From what I can tell it looks right=I didn't see any mistakes.
 
Neolight said:
View attachment 214150 View attachment 214151

I'm really sorry about that tilted photos.
Here are my calculations

You say your answer of V= Q/3Πξ.R is wrong. I cannot figure out if you mean ##\frac{Q}{2 \pi \xi R}## or ##\frac{Q}{3 \pi \xi} R## or something else. Parentheses would help.

Anyway, why do you think you answer is wrong? What is the apparent correct answer?

(I, for one, will not look at posted images; I look at typed work only, except for diagrams.)
 
Ray Vickson said:
You say your answer of V= Q/3Πξ.R is wrong. I cannot figure out if you mean ##\frac{Q}{2 \pi \xi R}## or ##\frac{Q}{3 \pi \xi} R## or something else. Parentheses would help.

Anyway, why do you think you answer is wrong? What is the apparent correct answer?

(I, for one, will not look at posted images; I look at typed work only, except for diagrams.)
Looks like the OP got the right answer, which is ## V=\frac{Q}{3 \pi \epsilon_o R} ##. And the OP should use an ## \epsilon_o ## (epsilon), rather than a ## \xi_o ## (xi).
 
Last edited: