Did I Solve the Impulse Momentum Problem Correctly?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the impulse momentum problem involving a particle of mass 2 kg moving at 5 m/s. The impulse was calculated using the area under the Force vs. Time graph, yielding an impulse of 0.5 Ns, leading to a final velocity of 5.25 m/s. The average force was also confirmed to be 5 N, consistent with the impulse-momentum theorem. Additionally, the discussion touches on deriving force from potential energy and clarifies the correct use of the potential energy function U(x) in energy conservation equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impulse-momentum theorem
  • Familiarity with Force vs. Time graphs
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions
  • Ability to differentiate functions to find force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Learn how to calculate impulse from Force vs. Time graphs
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and force using calculus
  • Practice energy conservation problems involving potential and kinetic energy
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to impulse, momentum, and energy conservation.

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I took a test today and I am pretty sure I got everything right except for this one problem that was on there which I am unsure of. If I remember correctly, it went like this:

It said there was a particle of mass 2 kg moving with a speed of 5 m/s to the right. Then there was a graph that more or less looked like this one I just made:

2dqixc8.jpg


The question asked what the final velocity was after the impulse.

Homework Equations



I believe this is correct and relevant.
\int F dt = J = ΔP = mv_{f} - mv_{i}

The Attempt at a Solution



I wagered that since the impulse was equal to the area under the curve on a Force v. Time graph, that the problem could be done in this way:

J = \frac{1}{2}(base)(height)
J = \frac{1}{2}(0.10)(10)
J = 0.5

J = mv_{f} - mv_{i}
0.5 = (2)v_{f} - (2)(5)
10.5 = (2)v_{f}
5.25 = v_{f}

So I said the velocity afterwards was 5.25 m/s (and part b asked the direction, which I claimed was to the right).

It's unlike any practice/hw/quiz problems we have had before and there was some equation she wrote on the board:
F_{avg}Δt = mv_{f} - mv_{i}

Which I believe is basically what I did, I just didn't use that equation.

Did I mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the impulse was also to the right, you did fine.

FYI: You could have used your instructor's formula; In this case the average force is 10/2 = 5 N. Same answer, of course. (Since it's really the same thing.)
 
Whew, thank you.

Another question that I am a little sketchy about is one where they showed some function U(x) which represented potential energy with respect to distance.The mass of the thing was m kg The question(s) were:

a.)What is force:
I simply took the derivative of U, and my final answer was U'(x). Sorry I can't remember the function, but it was something that had the general shape of y = 1/x.

b.)If the object was released from it's origin, what is it's speed at x = 2?

I claimed that mgU(0) was the total energy on the system, and so, after the thing fell or whatever, the final velocity could be found via:

mgU(0) = mgU(2) + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
Solving for v obviously.

?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
a.)What is force:
I simply took the derivative of U, and my final answer was U'(x). Sorry I can't remember the function, but it was something that had the general shape of y = 1/x.
Almost. Given a potential energy function, the associated force is given by -dU/dx. The minus sign is important.

b.)If the object was released from it's origin, what is it's speed at x = 2?

I claimed that mgU(0) was the total energy on the system, and so, after the thing fell or whatever, the final velocity could be found via:

mgU(0) = mgU(2) + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
Solving for v obviously.
U(x) is the potential energy, not mgU(x). (You're confusing this with a gravitational PE problem, perhaps?)

You want:
U(0) = U(2) + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
 
Oh ok, I got confused trying to replicate the problem from memory into latex.

Yes I used F = -\frac{dU}{dx}
and I did use U(x) for potential, not mgU(x).
 
QuarkCharmer said:
Oh ok, I got confused trying to replicate the problem from memory into latex.

Yes I used F = -\frac{dU}{dx}
and I did use U(x) for potential, not mgU(x).
Good! :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
926
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
953
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K