Diff. eq determening IVT interval

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlevanchuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an initial value problem involving a first-order differential equation. The problem requires determining the largest interval on which a unique solution is guaranteed, given the initial condition.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the initial condition and the behavior of the solution based on the value of t. There is a focus on whether the interval for uniqueness can include negative values and how the initial condition affects the sign of the derivative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the logic behind associating the sign of the derivative with the interval of t. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relevance of the initial condition, but clarity on the reasoning remains to be established.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that t cannot equal zero, which is a critical constraint in determining the interval for the unique solution. The initial condition is specified at t=1, which influences the discussion on the interval's boundaries.

dlevanchuk
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the initial value problem

t*y' + 2y = e^(2t) ; y(1) = 0:

Determine the largest interval on which it is guaranteed to have a unique solution.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I just need somebody to tell me if i have a logic on this one :-S

I understand that t cannon equal zero. But also, the interval, that there is a unique solution, would be from 0 to positive infinity, because the initial condition sets y' to be positive..
If the interval would be going from negative infinity to 0, then y' would be negative, which violates the initial condition...

Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get y'>0 from y(1)=0?
 
vela said:
How did you get y'>0 from y(1)=0?


i divided both sides by t and got

y' + (2/t)*y = e^(2t)/t

then i plugged in 1 for t and 0 for y.

As a result I got y' = e^2
 
OK, so you meant y'(1)>0, not y'(t)>0. It's still not clear to me how you went from that to concluding that t>0. Why are you associating y'>0 with t>0 and y'<0 with t<0?

That's really beside the point, however. You don't need to look at the derivative. You just have to look at the initial condition itself. It's specified for t=1, so...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K