Difference between hourly wage and real GDP per hour worked?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theBEAST
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Per
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 5K views
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0
In 2008 the real GDP per hour worked was $45.70? I don't think this means that the average person was making $45.70...

Here is that graph that contains this data:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64325990/ECON%20102/Capture.PNG

Could someone please explain the difference?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
I did some similar work on this not too long ago using US nominal GDP.

In 1950 the labor force included 62,000,000 workers; produced a GDP of $293.7 billion; federal minimum wage was $0.75 per hour, however, the average hourly rate was $2.27 per hour.

Much of my analysis was done on minimum wage versus the average wage.

New workers will not earn near what experienced workers earned, so there will be discrepancies between the highest and lowest for various reasons. So experience is probably the biggest player between the min and the max.
 
theBEAST said:
In 2008 the real GDP per hour worked was $45.70? I don't think this means that the average person was making $45.70...

Here is that graph that contains this data:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64325990/ECON%20102/Capture.PNG

Could someone please explain the difference?

GDP is not as measure of personal income but of the nations weath by its producion and worth of goods and services. While you can break it down into a per capita basis, which would then reflect more a standard of living.
 
Last edited by a moderator: