MHB Difference Between Math Courses

Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the fundamental differences between various math courses, emphasizing the importance of foundational subjects for first-year university students. Trigonometry, Single Variable and Multivariable Calculus, and Linear Algebra are considered essential, while Discrete Math and Applied Math are also recommended, particularly for computer science students. The courses are ranked by their level of abstractness, suggesting a potential order for study. Geometry courses, including Euclidean and Non-Euclidean, are acknowledged as less familiar but still relevant. Overall, the interrelationships between these subjects enhance their richness and complexity.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
What is the basic difference between the following math courses?

Single Variable and Multivariable Calculus
Discrete Math and Applied Math
Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries
Trigonometry and Rational Trigonometry
Linear Algebra and Abstract Algebra
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you contemplating taking one or more of them?

It is a bit like comparing apples and oranges, and you can probably look up the subjects themselves, but for a first year mathematics student in university here, I would say that

1. Trigonometry
2. Single Variable and Multivariable Calculus
3. Linear Algebra and Abstract Algebra

are subjects that should be taken without question. (I didn't know what "rational trigonometry" is, though. Actually, I would expect 1. to be a high school course, depending on its level.)

I have ordered them according to abstractness, and I suppose something could be said for taking them in this order. Many people (e.g. computer scientists) would justly insist that you also take

4. Discrete Math and Applied Math

but please note that applied mathematics is not necessarily discrete. (It can be, but there are many other kinds of applied mathematics.) Depending on your curriculum, you may benefit from taking 3. and 4. at the same time, but typically neither is a prerequisite for the other, assuming both are introductory.

I am not sufficiently familiar with courses on geometry (let alone non-Euclidean geometry) to be of much help there. In any case, I consider 1-3 core courses and the others somewhat less so. Ultimately, however, there are many interrelationships between some of them that you will come to see in time. (This makes the subjects more rich and beautiful.)

P.S. I see you are online, but your status line suggests differently? In any case, I hope it helps.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K