Difference between the outer product

Click For Summary
The outer product |v><u| represents a linear operator on a Hilbert space, transforming any vector |w> into <v|w>|u>. In contrast, the tensor product |v>⊗|u> describes a composite state of two systems, typically used in physics. Both concepts are related through an isomorphism between a vector space and its dual, linking composite states to linear operators. The Kronecker product serves as a specific representation of the tensor product, particularly useful for linear operators. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for applications in quantum mechanics and linear algebra.
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Given \left| v\right&gt; and \left| u\right&gt; what is the difference between the outer product \left| v\right&gt;\left&lt; u\right| and the tensor product \left| v\right&gt;\otimes\left|u\right&gt;? Is the latter a matrix representation of the former in some basis? Which basis would that be?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
And what's the difference between a tensor product and a kronecker product?
 
I meant the tensor product \left&lt; v\right|\otimes\left| u\right&gt;.
 
|u><v| is a way of writing the tensor product of a vector and a dual vector (ie, an element of the Hilbert space and an element of its dual, which is usually casually identified with the Hilbert space using the inner product). This is a linear operator on the Hilbert space, sending |w> to <v|w>|u>. In general, the tensor product of a vector space and its dual is the space of (finite rank) linear operators on the vector space.

On the other hand, |u>|v> is an element of the tensor product of the vector space with itself, usually used in physics for describing a composite of two identical systems. Again, since there is an isomorphism between the vector space and its dual, there is one between the space of composite states and the space of linear operators. This is interesting, but I've never seen this put to good use.

Finally, the Kronecker product is just a particular representation of the tensor product, convenient for dealing with tensor products of linear operators.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K