"Different" energy eigenstates - clarification of meaning?

In summary, Gerard 't Hooft discusses the interference patterns observed in the double slit experiment and how the initial state of the fast variables must now be described as a superposition of different energy eigenstates. He argues that all so called "fast variables" must be in their ground state and that the excited modes of the fast variables are only virtually present.
  • #1
asimov42
377
4
Apologies for an additional thread (could not delete the previous one which was not coherent). After reading this paper:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-021-00464-7
"Fast Vacuum Fluctuations and the Emergence of Quantum Mechanics" Gerard ’t Hooft

I was struck by a general question - the paper states (in relation to interference in the double slit experiment that): "It does something else however: if we select one slit, and repeat this experiment many times, then we are making a selection among the initial states chosen for the fast variables. This selection will not be an even one! Therefore, the initial state of the fast variables must now be described as a superposition of different energy eigenstates."

't Hooft's formulation requires all so called "fast variables" to be in their ground state always (as far as I can tell). So my question is: what does it mean to have "different" energy eigenstates when all variables must be in their lowest-energy eigenstates? This is a more general question that is not specific to this paper. That is, what's different?

Are two energy eigenstates considered "different" if they differ by phase only? Or can variables with different energy eigenstates have the same energy but be distinguished by other aspects of the state that may be different? I am confused in general about how two variables can be in their lowest energy states and yet be "different."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I should have been more careful, I meant the Hamiltonian - from the paper: "Therefore, the initial state of the fast variables must now be described as a superposition of different energy eigenstates."

My understanding was that only one energy eigenstate was allowed in this case, in which all the fast variables have their lowest energy. Hence the superposition mentioned above confuses me.

Also, in a related paper 't Hooft mentions that "the excited modes [of the fast variables] are only virtually present."

Since the excited modes of the fast variables are forbidden by energy conservation, what does a 'virtual state' mean in the context above?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
905
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
773
Replies
1
Views
224
Back
Top