I Different expressions about time reversal and confusion

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
TL;DR Summary
Discrepancy between Sakurai and Bruus
In Sakurai, section 4.4, says that if ##\psi(x,t)## is a solution of Schrodinger equation then ##\psi^*(x,-t)## is always another solution. However, in the corrected version of "Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics, Bruus and Flensberg, 2016", section 7.1.4, restricts this condition and says that if we have time reversal symmetry ##H=H^*## then ##\psi^*(x,-t)## would be another solution. I would like to know which of these statements is correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hokhani said:
TL;DR Summary: Discrepancy between Sakurai and Bruus

In Sakurai, section 4.4, says that if ##\psi(x,t)## is a solution of Schrodinger equation then ##\psi^*(x,-t)## is always another solution. However, in the corrected version of "
Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics, Bruus and Flensberg, 2016", section 7.1.4, restricts this condition and says that if we have time reversal symmetry ##H=H^*## then ##\psi^*(x,-t)## would be another solution. I would like to know which of these statements is correct.
Sakurai must assume that the Hamiltonian has that property in general. It's not hard too see from the SDE that ##H = H^*## is required for this to make sense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus
Thanks, it seems that for the Hamiltonian in Sakurai, ##H=\frac{P^2}{2m}+V(x)##, which is in the position space, the Hermitian condition ##H=H^{\dagger}## fulfils automatically ##H=H^*## since ##V^\dagger=V## demands ##V=V^*##.
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus, Demystifier and PeroK
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
901
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top