Differential equation in the torus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing a vector field \( X \) defined in \( \mathbb{R}^3 \) that is invariant on the torus \( T^2 \) and has periodic orbits of the same period. The function \( f(x,y,z)=(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}-1)^2+z^2-4 \) is used to define the torus. While the user successfully derives a vector field in cylindrical coordinates, they encounter complications when attempting to express it in Cartesian coordinates. The conversation emphasizes that demonstrating the vector field's properties in cylindrical coordinates is sufficient, regardless of the coordinate system used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with vector fields
  • Knowledge of cylindrical and Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Basic concepts of topology related to the torus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of vector fields in cylindrical coordinates
  • Study periodic orbits in dynamical systems
  • Explore the mathematical definition and properties of the torus in \( \mathbb{R}^3 \)
  • Learn about the implications of coordinate transformations in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying dynamical systems, particularly those interested in vector fields and their behavior on manifolds like the torus.

rmiranda
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all.
Consider the torus T^2 as a subset of R^3, for example the inverse image of 0 by the function f(x,y,z)=(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}-1)^2+z^2-4.
I need to obtain a example of a vector field X defined in the whole R^3, such that:
1) X is invariant in the torus
2) the orbits of X in the torus are all periodic of the same period (I thought in something like the orbits being the parallels).

I can obtain such a v.f. in cylindrical coordinates, but when I put my example in cartesian coords, the equations are turning to be very complicated to my purpose, may be someone has a simpler example of such v.f.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmiranda said:
I can obtain such a v.f. in cylindrical coordinates

So is that a problem? Do you have to give it in a specific coordinate system? If you can show that the vector field is defined on all of space and satisfies the requirements in cylindrical coordinates, the argument is just as valid as in Cartesian ones, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K