Differential equation system, got stuck in a physics problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of differential equations related to the trajectory of a charged particle in a custom magnetic field. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and coordinate systems to address the complexity of the equations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a system of equations involving third derivatives, which is later corrected to second derivatives related to acceleration and velocity.
  • Another participant suggests using polar or spherical coordinates due to potential symmetry in the problem.
  • There is a proposal to express the equations in cylindrical coordinates, acknowledging the complexity of reconstructing the field function.
  • A participant derives a relationship involving the derivative of r(t) and expresses z''(t) in terms of r'(t), leading to further equations for x''(t) and y''(t).
  • Participants discuss the implications of setting a constant (κ) to zero, simplifying the equations, while noting that the general case remains complicated.
  • There is an exchange of appreciation for contributions, with one participant expressing curiosity about another's background in mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to correct the initial equations and explore different coordinate systems, but there is no consensus on a complete solution, particularly for the more general case involving κ ≠ 0.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on the choice of coordinate systems, which may affect the complexity of the equations.

ramses728
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hi guys,
I'm solving a pretty complex problem: calculating a trajectory of a charged particle in a custom magnetic field. I arrive to the point where this very nice equation system blocks my way :P

http://ramses728.altervista.org/img/phys.jpg

hope you can help me somehow
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a valid link, there's no picture in it. I'm using Firefox as a webbrowser.
 
Strange... But if you copy and paste it, it works 100%
 
As I understand it, the equation is
[tex]m x'''(t) = \frac{q z''(t) y(t)}{r(t)}, m y'''(t) = \frac{q z''(t) x(t)}{r(t)}, m z'''(t) = \frac{ q\left( x'(t) x(t) + y'(t) y(t) \right) }{ r(t) }[/tex]
(the last [itex]y'''(t)[/itex] in the original should be a [itex]z'''(t)[/itex] I presume), where
[tex]r(t) = \sqrt{ x(t)^2 + y(t)^2[/tex].

This looks very complicated. Are you sure it is correct? I would either try polar or spherical coordinates (especially if there is some kind of symmetry in the system), or otherwise to first solve [itex]x(r(t))[/itex] or at least the functions in a more convenient variable than [itex]t[/itex]. But actually, I have no idea :confused:
 
Yeah it's complicated indeed... and you got that right with [tex]z'''(t)[/tex]

I actually know what it should look like when it's solved (graphically i mean) and there is some pretty serious symmetry in the system... I'll give a shot with the cilindrical coordinates, but there will be much work at it especially because I have to reconstruct the field function with polar coordinates (mabye esier... who knows...)

anyway if someone has any ideas how to solve this (also with maple or similar), I'd relly apreciate it

as soon as i get the cilindrical set of equations, I'll post them.

thanks, ramses

Edit: ah yeah forgot to say it's an equation system, so three equations together
 
How did you get third derivatives? Kinematic equations always involve acceleration, the second derivative.
 
... you're right... i made some confusion added a derivation grade for acceleration and velocity XD ... so, here are the correct ones:

[tex] \left\{<br /> \begin{array}[l]{l}<br /> m x(t)'' = q z(t)' \frac{x(t)}{r(t)}\\<br /> m y(t)'' = q z(t)' \frac{y(t)}{r(t)}\\<br /> m z(t)'' = -\frac{q}{r(t)}(x(t)' x(t) + y(t)' y(t))\\<br /> \end{array}[/tex]

where

[tex]r(t)=\sqrt{x(t)^2 + y(t)^2}[/tex]

still working on those polar ones

thanks for your interest

(P.S. I finally realized that fourmulaes can be written with latex! XD)
 
So, as

[tex]r^{\prime}(t) = \frac{1}{2} \frac{(2 x(t) x^{\prime}(t) + 2 y(t) y^{\prime}(t))}{\sqrt{x^2(t) + y^2(t)}} = \frac{x(t)x^{\prime}(t) + y(t) y^{\prime}(t)}{\sqrt{x^2(t) + y^2(t)}}[/tex]

You can write

[tex]m z^{\prime \prime}(t) = -q r^{\prime}(t)[/tex]

Hence, for z you get

[tex]z^{\prime}(t) = \kappa - \frac{q}{m} r(t)[/tex]

where [tex]\kappa[/tex] is a constant.

Now, for [tex]\kappa = 0[/tex], the solution is straightforward. You will then get

[tex]x^{\prime \prime} = -(\frac{q}{m})^2 x(t)[/tex]

and

[tex]y^{\prime \prime} = -(\frac{q}{m})^2 y(t)[/tex]

But in the more general case, [tex]\kappa[/tex] may not be taken as 0, so you'll get

[tex]x^{\prime \prime}(t) = \frac{q}{m} x(t) (\frac{\kappa}{r(t)} - \frac{q}{m})[/tex]

and

[tex]y^{\prime \prime}(t) = \frac{q}{m} y(t) (\frac{\kappa}{r(t)} - \frac{q}{m})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
:bugeye: you got it! Well thanks very much!

just for curiosity are you a math student?
 
  • #10
I've only solved it for [tex]\kappa =0[/tex]. For [tex]\kappa \ne 0[/tex], it is still a nasty mess.

And, no, I'm not a student.
 
  • #11
It's still a great advance, because I can set the initial conditions for z velocity (so [tex]z(t)'[/tex]) to be 0 forcing the constant to be zero. So I have the problem solved for this specifical case. But as you say it still needs work for the more general case...

Hope you didn't take me thinking you were a student as offensive, I just thought that you were closely involved on math so supposed that. If any offense was taken I apologise. Thanks again for this partial solution
 
  • #12
No worries, mate. :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 233 ·
8
Replies
233
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K