Why Are Laplace Transforms Challenging in Differential Equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of using Laplace transforms in solving differential equations, particularly in the context of a systems modeling class. Key issues include finding the inverse Laplace transform of the function f(s) = (s+c)/((s+a)(s+b)^2) and the Laplace transform of F(t) = H(t-5)(t-5)^4. Participants highlight difficulties in obtaining correct factors in their solutions, with discrepancies noted between their results and those from Wolfram Alpha. The conversation also touches on the complexities of using Heaviside and Dirac Delta functions as forcing functions in ordinary differential equations (ODEs).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with Heaviside and Dirac Delta functions
  • Knowledge of convolution integrals in the context of transforms
  • Basic skills in solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Laplace transforms, focusing on convolution and inverse transforms
  • Learn about the application of Heaviside and Dirac Delta functions in differential equations
  • Explore partial fraction decomposition techniques for Laplace transforms
  • Review resources on solving ODEs with non-homogeneous terms
USEFUL FOR

Students in systems modeling, mathematicians, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those utilizing Laplace transforms and related functions.

cmmcnamara
Messages
121
Reaction score
2
Hi all, I'm taking a systems modeling class and as such a portion of the class consists of a differential equations review, mostly centered around Laplace transforms and some functions I've never had to deal with before so I was hoping for a bit of help if you'd all be so obliged! I have quite a few HW questions I can't seem to get just right.

The first one is to find the inverse laplace transform of:

[tex]f(s)=\frac{s+c}{(s+a)(s+b)^2}[/tex]

The way I went about this one was to separate one of the factors of [itex]\frac{1}{(s+b)}[/itex] out which itself has its own reverse transform in the table I'm using. Then I recognized the other factor as the polynomial quotient form which also has its own transform. Since I then had the product of two transforms, the total transform should be the convolution of the two inverses. My answer is very close to what Wolfram Alpha has to say is the proper inverse transform, but I am off by a factor:

[tex]F(t)=\frac{(a-c)(e^{-bt}-e^{-at})}{(a-b)^2}+\frac{c-b}{a-b}te^{-bt}[/tex]

I missing the factor of [itex]e^{-bt}[/itex] on the last term for some reason. I though I lost it during some portion of the convolution integral but I have triple checked my math and can't find anything.

Another problem I'm having is another missing factor in a problem finding the Laplace transform of a function:

[tex]F(t)=\mathcal{H}(t-5)(t-5)^4[/tex]

I recognized that the binomial can be expanded and then the Heaviside function distributed to each term. This sets up a series of transforms of the form [itex](-1)^nt^nF(t)[/itex] which has the transform of [itex]f^{(n)}(s)[/itex]. In this case f(s) is the transform of the Heaviside function. I get the following answer after differentiating and simplifying:

[tex]F(t)=\frac{-24e^{-5s}}{s^5}(26s^4-1)[/tex]

However Wolfram Alpha shows the proper answer is missing the factor of [itex]26s^4-1[/itex]. Can anyone verify this as being correct/incorrect?

Those are the only real issues I'm having dealing with Laplace transforms. The other issues I am having revolve around solving ODE's that use the Heaviside and Dirac Delta functions as forcing functions. I have never had to deal with these before and am having some interesting troubles solving equations involving these functions. Is there any elementary reading sources on these functions besides Wikipedia? I'm finding their explanation of these functions are a bit over my head in terms of basic understanding. I'm attempting to solve them at the moment with Laplace transform as asked in my HW assignments but unless the initial conditions are 0 such that those terms cancel out, I'm finding the reverse transforms to be exceedingly difficult due to the additive terms (from the initial conditions) causing convolutions using the mentioned functions (which is at least the only way as far as I can tell) and those integrals have me scratching my head. Any help would be appreciated, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you get when you separated the integrand into partial fractions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K