How to integrate \frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order differential equation given by u''(x) + A(x)u'(x) - S(S+1)u(x) = 0, where A(x) = \frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}. The participants detail the transformation of this equation to eliminate the first derivative term, leading to a simpler form v''(x) - (S + 1/2)^{2}v(x) = 0. They also discuss boundary conditions and the general solution obtained using Maple, emphasizing the importance of integrating A(x) and the resulting expressions for C_1 and C_2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, specifically logarithmic integration
  • Experience with mathematical software like Maple for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integrating factors for solving linear differential equations
  • Learn about boundary value problems and their applications in physics
  • Explore the use of Maple for symbolic computation in differential equations
  • Investigate the properties of non-homogeneous oscillators in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in boundary value problems and mathematical modeling in physics.

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with this equation

\frac{d^2\Omega(\alpha)}{d\alpha^2}+\frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-\alpha}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-\alpha}}\frac{d\Omega(\alpha)}{d\alpha}-S(S+1)\Omega(\alpha)=0

Boundary conditions are

\Omega(0)=1

[\Pi^S_{p=-S}(p-\frac{d}{d\alpha})]\Omega(\alpha)|_{\alpha=0}=0

How to to transform part before first derivative \frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-\alpha}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-\alpha}}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\Phi and S are constants! Thanks for your answer!
 
The general solution to the equation (maple obtained) is

\Omega(x)= \frac{e^{-x/2}}{-\Phi-1+\Phi e^{-x}}(C_{1}e^{x(S+1/2)}+C_{2}e^{-x(S+1/2)})

The first boundary condition puts the constraint

C_{1}+C_{2}=-1

while the second one says

\Pi_{p=-S}^{p=S} [p-[(1+2S)C_{2}+S-\Phi]] =0

which is a product with a finite number of terms. I assume S is an integer or half integer A solution is obtained by cancelling any factor of the product. You get a solution for any C2 satisfying

(1+2S)C_{2}+S-\Phi=p, -S\le p \le S

All this needs some checking
 
Last edited:
Ok! But how to get solution without use of any computer programme? How to solve this with pencil and paper? What is the idea?
 
Well, first thing I thought was eliminating the term in the first derivative by a standart trick. If

u''(x)+A(x)u'(x)-S(S+1)u(x)=0then it turns out that u(x)=exp(-\frac{1}{2}\int{A(x')dx'})v(x) transforms the equation into

v''+[-S(S+1)-A^2/4-A'/2]v=0

In this case, we have

\int{A(x)dx}=-2ln[\frac{exp(-x/2)}{-1-\Phi+\Phi exp(-x)}]

And the resulting equation for v(x) is

v''(x)-(S+1/2)^{2}v(x)=0

resulting in the solution above. This equation has several lucky "coincidences", but the procedure to eliminate the first derivative term is standard, and very useful for non-homogeneous oscilators
 
gato_ said:
Well, first thing I thought was eliminating the term in the first derivative by a standart trick. If

u''(x)+A(x)u'(x)-S(S+1)u(x)=0


then it turns out that u(x)=exp(-\frac{1}{2}\int{A(x')dx'})v(x) transforms the equation into

v''+[-S(S+1)-A^2/4-A'/2]v=0

Are you sure about this?

I get equation

v''+[-S(S+1)+\frac{A^2}{4}-\frac{A}{2}-\frac{A'}{2}]v=0
 
gato_ said:
Well, first thing I thought was eliminating the term in the first derivative by a standart trick. If

u''(x)+A(x)u'(x)-S(S+1)u(x)=0


then it turns out that u(x)=exp(-\frac{1}{2}\int{A(x')dx'})v(x) transforms the equation into

v''+[-S(S+1)-A^2/4-A'/2]v=0

In this case, we have

\int{A(x)dx}=-2ln[\frac{exp(-x/2)}{-1-\Phi+\Phi exp(-x)}]

And the resulting equation for v(x) is

v''(x)-(S+1/2)^{2}v(x)=0

resulting in the solution above. This equation has several lucky "coincidences", but the procedure to eliminate the first derivative term is standard, and very useful for non-homogeneous oscilators

How you get this form v''(x)-(S+1/2)^{2}v(x)=0 from v''+[-S(S+1)-A^2/4-A'/2]v=0?
 
By substituting A
 
A(x)=\frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}

A'(x)=[\frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}]'

A'(x)=\frac{-\Phi e^{-x}[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]-[(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}]\Phi e^{-x}}{[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]^2}=\frac{-2\Phi e^{-x}(1+\Phi)}{[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]^2}

\frac{-A'(x)}{2}=\frac{\Phi e^{-x}(1+\Phi)}{[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]^2}

\frac{-A^2}{4}=-\frac{\frac{(1+\Phi)^2}{4}+\frac{1}{2}(1+\Phi)\Phi e^{-x}+\frac{1}{4}\Phi^2 e^{-2x}}{[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]^2}

\frac{-A^2}{4}-\frac{A'(x)}{2}=-\frac{\frac{(1+\Phi)^2}{4}-\frac{1}{2}(1+\Phi)\Phi e^{-x}+\frac{1}{4}\Phi^2 e^{-2x}}{[(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}]^2}=-\frac{1}{4}

\upsilon''(x)-(S+\frac{1}{2})^2\upsilon(x)=0


Thanks!
 
  • #10
You are welcome
 
  • #11
gato_ said:
In this case, we have

\int{A(x)dx}=-2ln[\frac{exp(-x/2)}{-1-\Phi+\Phi exp(-x)}]

I got

\int \frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx=2ln[\frac{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}{\Phi e^{-x}}]


I have done this integral like

\int \frac{(1+\Phi)+\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx=\int\frac{1+\Phi}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx+\int\frac{\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx

and got

\int\frac{1+\Phi}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx=ln[\frac{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}{\Phi e^{-x}}]

and

\int\frac{\Phi e^{-x}}{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}dx=ln[{(1+\Phi)-\Phi e^{-x}}]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
965
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K