Differential Equations Mixture problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a differential equations mixture problem involving a salt solution. Initially, a 40-liter solution with 100 grams of salt is mixed, while a new solution enters at 2 grams per liter and flows out at the same rate. Participants debate the correctness of their equations, with one initially arriving at a negative time solution, which is deemed incorrect. The consensus emerges that the problem may have been set up incorrectly, as the incoming solution is less concentrated than the target, making it impossible to reach the desired salt concentration of 120 grams. Ultimately, the problem is recognized as having no valid solution due to the conflicting concentrations.
Jeff12341234
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
at t=o an evenly mixed 40 liters solution with 100grams of salt is poured into a container. solution comes in at 2 grams per liter at 3 liters per minute and flows out at the same rate. At what time is the salt solution 120 grams?

I got -9.something minutes for my answer :/

This question was on a test I just took. It's from memory. The linear equation I got was
dA/dt+3/40*A=6

What should the answer be?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks right.
What is the initial concentration? What is the target concentration? What is the concentration coming in? Any surprise here?
 
Jeff12341234 said:
at t=o an evenly mixed 40 liters solution with 100grams of salt is poured into a container. solution comes in at 2 grams per liter at 3 liters per minute and flows out at the same rate. At what time is the salt solution 120 grams?

I got -9.something minutes for my answer :/

This question was on a test I just took. It's from memory. The linear equation I got was
dA/dt-3/40*A=6

What should the answer be?

There is 6g of salt going into the vessel and 3x/40 g leaving, so the salt contents in the vessel is changing at a rate of
dx/dt = 6 - 3x/40
which is not your equation. Your equation is adding the stuff that is supposed to be leaving!

(Jeez, I hope I got that right ... will trade answers when appropriate).
 
rude man said:
dx/dt = 6 - 3x/40
which is not your equation.
Good catch - I missed that. But I suspect it's just a transcription error in the post. The D.E as posted would not have led to a negative answer.
 
yea. I mistyped it. should've been dA/dt+3/40*A=6

The problem still remains though. He states that the mixture was just poured in at t=0 implying that a negative time is even more likely to be a wrong answer :/
 
Jeff12341234 said:
He states that the mixture was just poured in at t=0 implying that a negative time is even more likely to be a wrong answer :/
Pls try to answer my questions in post #2.
 
haruspex said:
Your equation looks right.
What is the initial concentration? What is the target concentration? What is the concentration coming in? Any surprise here?

100 grams per 40 liters initial
120 grams target
2 grams per liter at 3 liters per minute is coming in

None of that helps me in any way :/

Is my answer correct?
 
Jeff12341234 said:
100 grams per 40 liters initial
120 grams target
2 grams per liter at 3 liters per minute is coming in

None of that helps me in any way :/

Is my answer correct?

Yes, but let's put that in consistent units... 2.5g/l initially; 2g/l coming in; 3g/l target. See a problem with that?
 
there's only a problem because the same amount that is coming in is also leaving correct? that's why it never gets to 120? to add to that, the resulting function showed the amount gradually decreasing over time.
 
  • #10
Jeff12341234 said:
there's only a problem because the same amount that is coming in is also leaving correct? that's why it never gets to 120? to add to that, the resulting function showed the amount gradually decreasing over time.
Having expressed it in terms of concentrations, it doesn't matter whether the volume in the tank is increasing or decreasing. If you start with a solution more dilute than the target, and you add solution more dilute than the target, how are you ever going to reach the target concentration?
 
  • #11
ok. i see
 
  • #12
Jeff12341234 said:
there's only a problem because the same amount that is coming in is also leaving correct? that's why it never gets to 120? to add to that, the resulting function showed the amount gradually decreasing over time.

It does get to 120. In 63.83 sec.
 
  • #13
what function did you get?


jsRdctc.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Jeff12341234 said:
what function did you get?

EDIT: right answer after all. Sorry to confuse.

OK, we all agree on the ODE by now I take it, so have you tried to solve it? Show your effort.

Sorry again, I see you did, but I can't make out the top part.
 
  • #15
I edited the post above to show most of the work. You can't have negative time though especially since he says "at t=0 the well mixed solution was poured in" meaning that before that, the tank was empty
 
  • #16
Jeff12341234 said:
I edited the post above to show most of the work. You can't have negative time though especially since he says "at t=0 the well mixed solution was poured in" meaning that before that, the tank was empty

Hold everything, I have to reexamine what I did.

EDIT: the problem has no solution and haruspex is right.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Looking back on this problem, you might consider that the problem setter made an error. OTOH, it's quite a good exercise in recognising the significance of an apparently silly answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K